What would be a compelling argument? He basically states that since he moved closer he should be able to have more time. When we divorced I moved home to OC for financial reasons and he stayed in the SF. The SF courts, the mediator, suggested we should fly back and forth with that schedule and we did that for almost 3 years. Ridiculous but we made the best of it. During mediation in the beginning when things were some what civil I told him we could split time if he moved down. He declined decided to fight me for split time up there but the judge keep this same order. He waited three years to move and now he saying I moved and you said I could have more time give me more time or I will take you back to court. So, my question is moving from SF to OC enough evidence to get more time? My daughter has been in this routine for 3 years.