Law & Disorder: Michigan State Police Compare Searching Cell Phones to Cigarette Packs?

Posted over 3 years ago. 2 helpful votes

Email

MICHIGAN--The Michigan State Police now has a high-tech mobile forensics device that can be used to snatch information from cell phones belonging to motorists stopped for minor traffic violations. Their erroneous position is that perusing citizen cell phones is equivalent to searching a cigarette pack during a stop. Where does the assault on civil liberties end? The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan recently demanded that state officials stop stonewalling freedom of information (FOIA) requests for information on the program. The ACLU learned that the police had acquired the cell phone scanning devices and in August 2008 filed an official request for records on the program, including logs of how the devices were used. The state police responded by saying they would provide the information for the fee of $544,680. The ACLU found the charge outrageous. "Law enforcement officers are known, on occasion, to encourage citizens to cooperate if they have nothing to hide," ACLU staff attorney Mark P. Fancher wrote. "No less should be expected of law enforcement, and the Michigan State Police should be willing to assuage concerns that these powerful extraction devices are being used illegally by honoring our requests for cooperation and disclosure." The U.S. Department of Justice tested the CelleBrite UFED used by Michigan police and found that the device could snatch all of the photos and video off of an iPhone within one-and-a-half minutes. The device works with 3000 different phone models and can even defeat password protections. A CelleBrite brochure explains that the device has the power: "Complete extraction of existing, hidden, and deleted phone data, including call history, text messages, contacts, images, and geotags," And, "The Physical Analyzer allows visualization of both existing and deleted locations on Google Earth. In addition, location information from GPS devices and image geotags can be mapped on Google Maps." The ACLU is concerned that these powerful capabilities are being quietly used to bypass Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. "With certain exceptions that do not apply here, a search cannot occur without a warrant in which a judicial officer determines that there is probable cause to believe that the search will yield evidence of criminal activity," said Fancher. Mark Fancher further said "A device that allows immediate, surreptitious intrusion into private data creates enormous risks that troopers will ignore these requirements to the detriment of the constitutional rights of persons whose cell phones are searched." The national ACLU is currently suing the Department of Homeland Security for its policy of warrantless electronic searches of laptops and cell phones belonging to people entering the country who are not suspected of committing any crime. The only way for Americans to fight the undermining of civil liberties and privacy rights is to educate themselves regarding the Fourth Amendment and to remain ever vigilant plus share awareness through social networking/social media e.g. Facebook and Twitter. Citizens also need to beat the powers that be at their own game by using technology to block such intrusions as well as contact local legislators and members of U.S. Congress to sound off against unreasonable searches and seizures that clearly violate the U.S. Constitution.

Additional Resources

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/04/michigan-state-police-we-only-grab-your-cellphone-data-with-a-warrant.ars

arstechnica.com

Rate this guide

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

24,980 answers this week

2,987 attorneys answering