ive been working for a company for alittle over 4 months and i have heard from someone that if you have been working for more than 32 hours for 3 consecitive weeks they have to give you full time.
J Charles Ferrari Eng & Nishimura 213.622.2255 The statement above is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice, as not all the facts are known. You should retain an attorney to review all the facts specific to your case in order to receive advise specific to your case. The statement above does not create an attorney/client relationship. Answers on Avvo can only be general ones, as specific answers would require knowledge of all the facts. As such, they may or may not apply to the question.
Employment / Labor Attorney
What you heard from "someone" is incorrect. Categories such as "full-time," "part-time," "permanent," "temporary," "probationary," "regular," "casual," etc. are created and defined by an employer itself, not by law. The definition will vary from employer to employer. Employers create these categories for their own convenience, usually to indicate which employees are entitled to employee benefits and which are not.
For example, Employer No. 1 can define as "permanent" all employees who have worked six months or more, and can offer medical insurance to permanent employees only. Employer No. 1 can define as "temporary" all employees who have worked less than six months, and not offer medical insurance to temporary employees.
Employer No. 2 can define as "permanent" all employees who have worked one year or more, and can offer medical insurance and vacation to this group of employees. Employer No. 2 can define as "temporary" all employees who have worked between six months and one year, and can offer medical insurance to temporary employees but not vacation. Employer No. 2 can define as "probationary" all employees who have worked less than six months, and not offer any benefits to probationary employees.
Employer No. 3 can define as "full-time" all employees who work 30 more hours per week. Employer No. 3 can define as "part-time" all employees who work less than 30 hours per week. Employer No. 3 can offer overtime opportunities to full-time employees and not offer overtime to part-time employees.
Employer No. 4 can define as "full-time" all employees who work 40 more hours per week. Employer No. 4 can define as "part-time" all employees who work less than 40 hours per week. Employer No. 4 can treat full-time and part-time employees the same with respect to benefits or other work issues.
Some employers have policies providing that after an employee has worked a certain period of time in a particular category, the employee is moved to a different category, usually one that offers more job security or benefits. This generally happens only with government employers (federal, state, county, city) or in workplaces where employees are represented by a labor union.
*** All legal actions have time limits, called statutes of limitation. If you miss the deadline for filing your claim, you will lose the opportunity to pursue your case. Please consult with an experienced employment attorney as soon as possible to better preserve your rights. *** Marilynn Mika Spencer provides information on Avvo as a service to the public, primarily when general information may be of assistance. Avvo is not an appropriate forum for an in-depth response or a detailed analysis. These comments are for information only and should not be considered legal advice. Legal advice must pertain to specific, detailed facts. No attorney-client relationship is created based on this information exchange. *** Marilynn Mika Spencer is licensed to practice law before all state and federal courts in California, and can appear before administrative agencies throughout the country. She is eligible to represent clients in other states on a pro hac vice basis. ***
3 lawyers agree
No. Not true.
Attorney Spencer is correct. California law and California regulations do not provide a definition of what is considered "full time", but rather leave this to each specific employer to define.
Frank W. Chen is licensed to practice law in the State of California. The information presented here is general in nature and is not intended, nor should be construed, as legal advice. This posting does not create any attorney-client relationship with the author. For specific advice about your particular situation, consult your own attorney.