I was Pro se in a fraudulent civil law suit. The defendant owes me $ 7 440 in backwages for taking care of his children. I had paid $ 1 695.84 in excess of payments at the time the car was repossed. I submitted a month to month copy of the payments I made. The defendant went to the car dealer and got the sum total price of the car. Subtracted what I had paid and told me to pay the difference. The judge sided with him and did not take into consideration that he owed me back wages and that for 21 months i had paid $ 500.00 instead of $ 300. I took my case to the second court of appeals and they told me I did not comply with rule 38 d, g and i. They dismissed my case for want of prosecution. They are not looking at the facts of the lawsuit but rather disqualifying me on technical issues.
