I am an independent insurance agent that is a 1099 worker. One of the supervisors, or "Coordinators" that works in my office bullies his subordinates, or "team members." Specifically, he threatens to have them fired, if they do not meet his team goals, or does not follow the rules that he sets forth. He leads new agents to believe this is possible, which it is not, but they are not aware of it. Many of the agents on his team are scared and unsure what is right or wrong and they fear being in "trouble" or being fired for not following his "rules" or meeting goals. Does this constitute harassment, or misclassification of employee status? The supervisors above this person in the corporation state that they cannot do anything about it, is this true?
Personal Injury Lawyer
You need to repost your inquiry under the practice area of "Employment," so that it can be viewed by attorneys who practice in that area.
Ms. Berjis is licensed to practice law in the State of California. The laws of your jurisdiction may differ and thus this answer is for informational and educational purposes only and is not to be considered as legal advice. Since all facts are not addressed in the question, this answer could change depending on other significant and important facts. This answer in no way constitutes an attorney-client relationship.
7 lawyers agree
Car / Auto Accident Lawyer
A hostile work environment is a form of workplace harassment. And harassment is only illegal if it is directed against a member of a protected class (for example, if it is based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability or genetic information, or it is in retaliation for complaints of illegal conduct.
Being a jerk is bad management, but it isn't illegal.
Administrative Law Lawyer
Re: "...Specifically, he threatens to have them fired, if they do not meet his team goals, or does not follow the rules that he sets forth. He leads new agents to believe this is possible, which it is not..."
Threats to terminate workers for failure to meet productivity standards are not unlawful. If you are correct that it is not possible for agents to be fired from this employment on this basis, that impossibility is because of internal optional work rules, not because of legal constraints. Under CA law, any employer may terminate workers for any reason except a statutorily prohibited reason or a reason that violates public policy. Termination on the basis of failure to meet productivity measures, without more, would not violate either of these prohibitive standards.
There may indeed be a misclassification issue here, but it is unlikely that there is a viable claim for harassment or other unlawful employer conduct. Even so, you would be well advised to let these agents sort out their own work situations and potential claims. You have few if any protections in these circumstances, and you will not improve anyone else's situation by getting fired your own self.
No legal advice here. READ THIS BEFORE you contact me! My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as if they were legal advice. I give legal advice ONLY in the course of a formal attorney-client relationship. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me. That relationship is established only by joint execution of a written agreement for legal services. My law firm does not provide free consultations. Please do not call or write to me with a “few questions” that require me to analyze the specific facts of your history and your license application and prescribe for you how to get a State license. Send me an email to schedule a paid Consultation for that kind of information, direction, and assistance. My law firm presently accepts cases involving State and federal licenses and permits; discipline against State and federal licenses; and disciplinary and academic challenges to universities, colleges, boarding schools, and private schools. We take cases of wrongful termination or employment discrimination only if the claims involve peace officers, universities or colleges.
3 lawyers agree