If drugs are in my system but wasn't impaired do drive. Police report said my coordination was normal eyes were normal pulse was regular everything he wrote was normal. Does this mean that i'm under the influence.
You may be guilty of this crime if you are under the influence of drugs which were prescribed to you by a doctor, or even over-the-counter drugs if it can be proven they affected your ability to drive such that it made your driving while under the influence of a drug. The punishment for driving under the influence of drugs mirror those for driving while intoxicated.
Proving a person violated this law is not necessarily easy. The key for the Prosecution in proving drug cases is often whether the drug actually causes a significant or sufficient level of mental or physical impairment at the time of driving. The prosecutor must show that the drug actually impaired your driving. It is often impossible for the prosecutor to prove driving impairment based upon drugs. This is especially true where the charge is based ONLY on drug use and not the combination of alcohol with a drug. Interestingly, there are a number of drugs which may enhance your ability to drive; in some cases, the forensic or scientific evidence will be in the driver's favor. The DUI Prosecutor will try to prove the drive was under the influence of drug(s) by introducing evidence related to driving patterns, (often ambiguous) physical signs and symptoms, field sobriety testing performance and chemical tests.
It can be a defense if the drug causes one to drive with the same caution characteristic of a sober person or ordinary prudence under the same or similar circumstance. It is a defense if the driving pattern, (often ambiguous) physical signs and symptoms, field sobriety testing performance and chemical tests are just as consistent with non-impairment as they are with impairment. If charged with driving under the influence of prescription medication, sleep driving may possibly be a DUI defense in California. But the involuntary intoxication should be based on an unanticipated reaction to medication taken as lawfully prescribed.
California Criminal Jury Instruction Number 2110. Driving Under the Influence (Veh. Code, § 23152(a)) A person is under the influence if, as a result of (drinking [or consuming] an alcoholic beverage/ [and/or] taking a drug), his or her mental or physical abilities are so impaired that he or she is no longer able to drive a vehicle with the caution of a sober person, using ordinary care, under similar circumstances. The manner in which a person drives is not enough by itself to establish whether the person is or is not under the influence of (an alcoholic beverage/ [or] a drug) [or under the combined influence of an alcoholic beverage and a drug]. However, it is a factor to be considered, in light of all the surrounding circumstances, in deciding whether the person was under the influence.
You are likely referring to 23152(a) driving while under the influence of drugs or alcohol. In essence the prosecutor must prove that you could not drive with the same caution and care of a sober person. The manner in which you drove, performance on the FST’s, and observations of the police officer will all come into play. I doubt that the officer that arrested you was a DRE (drug recognition expert). Many drugs can stay in the system after the effects of the drugs have worn off – metabolites. It is unclear if you were just arrested or are being prosecuted for this offense. Drug DUI’s are hard for a prosecutor to prove. If you are charged you should hire an attorney.
It means its in your system. If you eat a jelly doughnut, then for a period of time afterward you are under the influence of the jelly doughnut. The legal question that you are referring to is whether or not you were under the influence to the extent that your normal faculties were impaired. That is what they look at. Based on the information you gave, it sounds like you weren't impaired.
THESE COMMENTS ARE NOT LEGAL ADVICE. They are provided for informational purposes only. Actual legal advice can only be provided after consultation by an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. Answering this question does not create an attorney-client relationship or otherwise require further consultation.
Get free answers from experienced attorneys.
25,134 answers this week
2,662 attorneys answering
Don't speak legalese? We define thousands of terms in plain English.Browse our legal dictionary