Is the difference between the two simply that one involves alcohol and the other doesn't? I'm not really sure what the difference between the two is.
These are completely different charges. Reckless driving is a non alcoholic related offense which would make it a great plea reduction. The only issue is that it involves a 3 month hard suspension. Usually if the prosecutor is willing (which many many times they are not), I try to get it reduced to a careless driving (civil infraction).
I agree with everything every other attorney said. Reckless is a non-alcoholic offense that carries 6 points on your license and a $500 responsibility fee for 2 consecutive years. A zero tolerance is a more serious alcohol charge, with penalties of Four points on driver record, $500 Driver Responsibility Fee for two consecutive years, and fines and court costs. Note that a Reckless carries a 90 suspended license (as the other attorney pointed out), and there can be no hardship appeal for this. It will be suspended for 90 days.
Reckless can apply to any driver of any age, but doesn't involve alcohol. Zero tolerance involves only underage drivers under the influence. Other sentencing guidelines are as the other attorneys have outlined above. If you are facing either one of these charges you should consult an attorney to get the best representation you can.
Get free answers from experienced attorneys.
25,176 answers this week
2,663 attorneys answering
Don't speak legalese? We define thousands of terms in plain English.Browse our legal dictionary