Skip to main content

What is my attorney knows that the other attorney lied

Champaign, IL |

The opposing attorney filed a counterclaim and accused me of what I am accusing the defendant of. My attorney knows that he has falsified this information but doesn't "want to upset" the other attorney.

Attorney Answers 2


That will all get sorted out in discovery, settlement and perhaps a trial. Unless the other attorney ABSOLUTELY knows his client is lying (and this is hard, because an attorney is bound to believe his own client unless his assertions are ridiculous on their face), he can make the claims on behalf of the client.

I'd be willing to bet that that your attorney cares not one whit about "upsetting" the other lawyer, but often at the initial pleading stages, all kinds of spaghetti is thrown at the wall to see what sticks as the proceeding moves forward. It's just not worth getting upset about, because pleadings aren't taken all that seriously and it's felt that "it will all come out in the wash".

And usually, it's not that "the other attorney lied", but that his CLIENT that told him the facts "lied" (at least to your way of thinking about what the truth is). At this stage of the game, it's like "liar's poker" and there's a lot of posturing and "bluffing". Ask Avvo and your attorney again after there are depositions if the other side is still maintaining its counterclaim.

This answer is provided under the “Terms and Conditions of Use” (“ToU”), particularly ¶9 which states that any information provided is not intended as legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship between you and me or any other attorney. Such information is intended for general informational purposes only and should be used only as a starting point for addressing your legal issues. In particular, my answers and those of others are not a substitute for an in-person or telephone consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction about your specific legal issue, and you should not rely solely upon Legal Information you obtain from this website or other resources which may be linked to an answer for informational purposes. You understand that questions and answers or other postings to the Site are not confidential and are not subject to attorney-client privilege. The full Avvo ToU are set forth at . In addition, while similar legal principles often apply in many states, I am only licensed to practice in the State of New York and Federal Courts. Any general information I provide about non-New York laws should be checked with an attorney licensed to practice in your State. Lastly, New York State Court rules (22 NYCRR Part 1200, Rule 7.1) also require me to inform you that my answers and attorney profile posted on the site may be considered "attorney advertising" and that "prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome".

Mark as helpful

1 lawyer agrees


Frequently, counterpetitions and counterclaims contain language which reverse the original accusation, making the accuser the accused. Divorce cases are a prime example. Without knowing what sort of case you have, it is not really possible to respond. Furthermore, opposing counsel has not lied. Assuming the counterclaim was prepared by opposing counsel on behalf of his client, these are not really the words of the attorney. Whatever the issue here, you have a lawyer and should be discussing it with him/her. In the long run, this matter should get straightened out during the pendency of the proceedings and if the alleged false allegations are serious enough, you may have a basis to seek damages under Supreme Court Rule 137.

Mark as helpful

2 lawyers agree


Jack Richard Lebowitz

Jack Richard Lebowitz


We have a similar rule to Supreme Court Rule 137 (22 NYCRR Part 130 and federal FRCP Rule 12) that requires attorneys to certify the factual allegations aren't "frivolous", but attorneys almost universally (especially in divorce cases) get their clients to execute affidavits that say "all the facts came from the client's mouth and the attorney knows nothing and hasn't independently investigated the facts".

Judy A. Goldstein

Judy A. Goldstein


SR 137 requires the attorney to certify that s/he has read the pleading, motion or other paper document; that to the best of his/her knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry [NOTE THE REASONABLE INQUIRY] it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good-faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.

Personal injury topics

Top tips from attorneys

What others are asking

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer

Browse all legal topics