We found more damage after the final walk through, can we charge the tenant for it? what can we charge?

Asked about 1 year ago - San Francisco, CA

After the final walk through and the carpet is cleaned, we realize that those stains on the carpet is not stain, it is burns. We phone the tenant right away the same day of the walk through and told her that we have to replace the carpet due to the damage, and she said get an estimate first and don't do anything yet. After I got the estimate and gave her the itemized deduction form and the estimate. She claiming that there was no mention of replacing the carpets during the final walk through. Because the carpet have burn marks in the living room and it is all connected to the dinning area; thus, I got estimate for both area and then charge the remaining life of the old carpet. Is this proper? The tenant only want to pay the burn repair, can you repair a burned carpet?

Attorney answers (2)

  1. Frank Wei-Hong Chen

    Contributor Level 20
    Best Answer
    chosen by asker

    Answered . The general rule is yes, you can still charge a former tenant for additional damages discovered after the final walkthrough, provided you otherwise comply with Civil Code section 1950.5. However, the amount that you can charge may be somewhat limited. First of all, repair might be possible. (You'll need to consult with a flooring/carpet contractor.) Even if not, the typical method of calculating the deduction for replacement prorates the total cost of replacement so that the tenant pays only for the remaining useful life of the carpet that the tenant has damaged or destroyed.

    Frank W. Chen has been licensed to practice law in California since 1988. The information presented here is... more
  2. Pardis Patrick Ashouri

    Contributor Level 17

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered . You should check with a flooring contractor to make sure it is your property. Under California law within 21 days landlord should provide a list of repairs caused by tenant ( not wear and tear ) and return of remaining security deposit if any. You should have had a prep move in inspection which outlines the condition of the premises as well as a move out inspection. The fact that burn vs stain was discovered later than the move out inspection is not so much an issue than the timely report and counting and demand for additional costs under the 21 day mandate.
    You can file small claim action if damages caused by tenant and not enough security deposit to cover. Good luck.

    In addition to AVVO's disclaimer, please note that by this answer no attorney client relationship is intended and... more

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

24,035 answers this week

2,817 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

24,035 answers this week

2,817 attorneys answering