Under Oregon Driving Laws, by driving you need to follow the "Implied Consent Law", meaning you need to submit a alcohol test if asked by a police officer. But does that mean you automatically need to if they ask? Or is it only if they actually arrest you for a DUII that you need to submit one? If they don't actually arrest you, do you need to do their tests if they ask? Or can you just politely refuse, saying you need to consult an attorney first?
Also, it's illegal to be drunk in public, right? But you aren't driving, so the "Implied Consent Law" has no influence over you, correct? So how would a police officer test your blood alcohol level, or administer tests if you are walking? Are you still able to refuse? What if you are under 21? Can you still refuse to take an alcohol test?
Under 21 you have no right to drink.
You can refuse an alcohol test. If you do and they have evidence that you have been driving you can lose your license to drive.
In Wisconsin, for the implied consent to kick in you must have been arrested for OWI (DUI).
You do not have to take field sobriety tests. You do not have to blow into handheld breath machines at the roadside.
If any answer on AVVO helps you, mine or someone else’s, please mark it as "helpful" or "best answer" to help AVVO know which answers to show others.
--- Experienced DUI/DWI/OWI/Drunk Driving Lawyer in Madison, Wisconsin
--- Facebook Page Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin Drunk Driving / OWI / DWI / DUI Lawyer
--- Field sobriety "tests" – Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin DUI / DWI / OWI / Drunk Driving lawyer
--- DUI/DWI/Drugged Driving with Prescription Drugs – Madison Wisconsin
--- Ten Days to Save Your License - Administrative Suspension and Refusals in Madison (Dane County) Wisconsin
Confidential information should not be disclosed in this Internet forum. I am a Wisconsin lawyer. The laws in each jurisdiction can be very different. I cannot give legal advice over the internet nor can I establish an attorney client relationship with you. You should NOT assume or otherwise conclude that there is an attorney -client relationship between any reader and this writer or his firm. These comments are only guideposts. They are not subject to any privilege protections. Indeed, these internet communications are neither privileged nor confidential. Accordingly, those using this form of communication need to be guarded in what they write. Because of the nature of these communications the information is general only and should not be relied upon in any specific case. This internet site is public forum, where the communications are not confidential or privileged. There may very well be merit to your defense or position in this type of situation. However, there are hardly sufficient details for an attorney to provide you with some path to follow. It is imperative that ALL of the facts in a particular situation be examined. No conclusion can be drawn from the communication that you have provided. There are some matters that are just better handled by an attorney familiar with the procedures of the courts in your area. Most, if not all, legal matters should not be handled via internet communication. At best, the responders on this site can give you a few hints and guidance. To deal with a legal problem, nothing is better than to consult with a lawyer who will give you some time and advice. If you cannot afford an attorney, there should be agencies in your area that can provide discounted, or even free, legal services. Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer in Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin http://addbalance.com Talking to the Police - Advice from Lawyers and Police: http://addbalance.com/police.htm
Criminal Defense Attorney
Mr. Kenyon is on point. To add to his comment, Oregon officers are allowed to perform a blood draw without a warrant.
Nothing in this communication should be construed as creating an attorney client relationship. This is for informational purposes only. Attorney will take no action on your behalf unless and until a written retainer agreement is signed. There are strict time deadlines on filing claims and, as such, you are advised to consult with and retain an attorney immediately to file such claims timely or you will lose any right to recovery.
Whether you must take the tests and whether you should take the tests are very different questions. You seem to have a handle on the Implied Consent Law, that's a DMV thing that could cost you your license.
It is not illegal to refuse to take field sobriety tests or refuse to answer questions - we have a constitutional right not to answer questions. The police can draw someone's blood with or without a warrant so, there's that to think about. You should probably as for lawyer at the same time to invoke your right to silence: " My lawyer told me not to answer any questions or take those tests."
Personal Injury Lawyer
If you are walking and the police request a sobriety test, that is a search and either they have a warrant or some exception to the warrant requirement. Your consent is one of those exceptions. The extent to which you need to agree depends upon all the circumstances, e.g., are you under arrest? Whenever the police seek information, you should carefully consider the circumstances and ask if you are under arrest before answering any questions.
This answer if for general information only.