There was a car that had run out of gas on the overpass. I was driving behind a large truck and had no view of anything in front of me. I pulled around the truck and saw the car about 10 feet in front of me. I slammed on the brakes but it was raining and I slid into them. I am wondering who is at fault.
Workers' Compensation Lawyer
Were the police called, and was an accident report created? That will tell you who the officer believes was at fault. Based on what you posted, I'd guess that you would ultimately be held at fault for the accident.
*Attorney Thomas Andrew Miller (678-907-3600) provided this Reply which is intended to be helpful to the Asker and the Avvo Community, but it does not constitute legal advice and does not create any attorney-client relationship. You are urged to seek the advice of an attorney or, in some cases, a tax professional, before taking any action. **Was this Answer helpful? Please click to give the Answer a Helpful Vote or make it the Best Answer!
The general rule is that whoever hits the other car from behind, that person is the one at fault. There are exceptions to this, and it generally would be a question to be answered by a Judge or jury. If you were given a ticket, you need to consult with a criminal attorney to see if there is a circumstance under which you could have the charges dismissed or reduced. If insurance is involved, you should consider contacting your insurance company to see if they have a lawyer to defend the civil claim or if you should hire your own attorney to defend you from a civil claim.
The above information is general in nature. In order to obtain more specific and legal advice upon which to base your important decisions, please contact our office directly for a free phone or in person consultation. Robert M. Gardner, Jr. Hicks, Massey & Gardner, LLP email@example.com 53 W. Candler St. Or 718 Oak St. Winder, Ga. 30680 Gainesville, Georgia (770) 307-4899 (770) 538-0555 gadebtlaw.com hicksmasseyandgardner.com serving metro Atlanta and all of Northeast Georgia Bankruptcy, Divorce, Personal Injury, Worker’s Compensation, Medical Malpractice, Adoption, Civil and Criminal Litigation
Car / Auto Accident Lawyer
Your question has two aspects: criminal liability and civil liability. Under the traffic offense statutes, generally if you rear end someone, you're guilty of "Following too closely" - even in emergency situations. But if the facts are not in dispute by anyone and are just as you've described, I can see a jury or even a judge finding you not guilty. I would say there would be a good likelihood of the same outcome in a civil case so long as there was absolutely no other negligence on your part such as speeding, excessive lane changing, etc. In civil MVA law, there is the principle of true "accident". And a civil jury could find that you were not negligent and that the incident was just an accident. If you get a citation, make sure you talk it over with an attorney before you enter any kind of plea. And if you do enter a plea, make sure to tender a nolo plea so it can't be held against you if there is a civil case.
Divorce / Separation Lawyer
As to criminal liability (traffic court),you have described a classic following too close case, and since you have a duty to bve careful, and passing a truck on an overpass in the rain at Spoaghetti Junction is not being careful, a judge probably convicts you, although a good traffic lawyer might negotiate a more favorable outcome.
As to civil liability, you likely will be held responsible. If you have full coverage your insurer will fix your car (and the one you hit). Otherwise you get to fix your own.
Note that all of this is fact dependent and sometimes a tiny detail affects the answer. Let the insurers sort it out, and if you got a ticket, see a lawyer.
If you find this answer helpful, please mark it here on AVVO as helpful. In answering you, I am attempting to communicate general legal information and am not representing you (and am not your lawyer). Do feel free to call me at 404-768-3509 if you wish to discuss actual representation (the phone call also does not retain counsel; that requires an office visit and appropriate paperwork). In that a forum such as this provides me with limited details and doesn't allow me to review details and documents, it is possible that answers here, while meant to be helpful, may in some cases not be complete or accurate, and I highly recommend that you retain legal counsel rather than rely on the answers here. (You can also email my office at firstname.lastname@example.org . An email also does not retain my office, but can help you get an appointment set if you prefer not to call). I am happy to discuss possible representation with you. Any information in this communication is for discussion purposes only, and is not offered as legal advice. There is no right to rely on the information contained in this communication and no attorney-client relationship is formed. Nothing in my answer should be considered as tax-advice. To ensure compliance with IRS Circular 230, any U.S. federal tax advice provided in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by the recipient or any other taxpayer (i) for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on the recipient or any other taxpayer, or (ii) in promoting, marketing or recommending to another party a partnership or other entity, investment plan, arrangement or other transaction addressed herein. Note that I am only licensed in Georgia and thus cannot practice in other states. I am also required to advise you, if your question concerns bankruptcy, that the U.S. Congress has designated Ashman Law Office as a debt relief agency that can help people file bankruptcy.
Personal Injury Lawyer
Based upon the facts as you have stated them, you were at fault.
Disclaimer: This response is provided to you by attorney Robert G. Rothstein (404) 216-1422 for educational and informational purposes only.No attorney-client relationship has been created hereby. Other attorneys may have different opinions or responses. If you found this response helpful, please indicate Best Answer to Avvo. Thank you.
1 lawyer agrees
Personal Injury Lawyer
Probably a combination of fault. Obviously, one should "run out of gas" and not be able to get out of the travel lanes. That is negligence. You, on the other hand, potentially have a legal "excuse" known as the "sudden emergency" doctrine. In the end, you you were not seriously injured, the claim is probably not worth pursuing in court as the other insurance company will blame you and probably get some traction with a judge/jury and it would reduce whatever damages you proved in proportion to the percentage of fault assigned to you. If the fact finder assigns 50% fault to you, you recover 0$. Georgia is what is known as an "equal fault bar" state.