My colleagues are correct. Although you highlight important clauses in the contract, these clauses must be read in the context of the language in the rest of the contract to properly construe its meaning. Additionally, there can be no definitive answer on whether clause 9 applies absent perusal of the contract or other agreement between company A and company B as to their relationship, whether merger, acquisition, sale of substantially all assets, or something else.
Those issues aside, your non-compete may not be enforceable for other reasons. Assuming New York law applies to your case, the courts here do not favor these types of agreements. Courts will generally not enforce these agreements unless they are reasonable in their scope, limited in their time, and geographically limited to ensure the protection of the business' legitimate competitive interests. Knock out any one of those elements, and your non-compete may be a non-issue.
My advice is that if you are being sued, you should see an attorney to ensure the best possible defense is interposed to protect your interests in this claim.
Good luck with your case.
The author of this posting is licensed to practice law in the State of New York. He specializes in litigation matters relating to personal injury, construction accidents, auto accidents, slip and fall, dog bite, contract litigation, property litigation, civil rights, ERISA, and Social Security matters in federal, state and local courts, with a focus on courts in Staten Island, Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. This posting is intended as general information only, is not provided as legal advice in connection with any specific case, and should not be construed to create an attorney-client relationship.
An attorney would have to read the entire agreement and review all the facts to accurately answer this question. You should schedule a consultation with a business litigation attorney.
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this e-mail and all copies and attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. IRS Circular 230 Notice: Unless specifically stated otherwise, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. Unless specifically stated otherwise, this communication shall not be deemed to be legal or tax advice, and no attorney-client relationship shall be deemed to have been created.
I could try to parce this out and stab at what I think are relevant aspects, but the simple truth is, and as my colleague noted, the agreement will need to be reviewed as well as all the facts and circumstances.
I too am in NY and offer a free phone consult so feel free to contact me if you care to discuss in more detail and in private.
The law firm of Natoli-Lapin, LLC (Home of Lantern Legal Services) offers our flat-rate legal services in the areas of business law and intellectual property to entrepreneurs, small-to-medium size businesses, independent inventors and artists across the nation and abroad. Feel free to call for a free phone consultation; your inquiries are always welcome: CONTACT: 866-871-8655 Support@LanternLegal.com DISCLAIMER: this is not intended to be specific legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. No attorney-client relationship is formed on the basis of this posting.