You need to request all your medical records from this office and them contact a local medical malpractice attorney to see if the care and treatment you received was substandard.
DISCLAIMER: David J. McCormick is licensed to practice law in the State of Wisconsin and this answer is being provided for informational purposes only because the laws of your jurisdiction may differ. This answer based on general legal principles and is not intended for the purpose of providing specific legal advice or opinions. Under no circumstances does this answer constitute the establishment of an attorney-client relationship.
Consult an attorney immediately because you may be running into a Statute of Limitations issue based upon California Code of Civil Procedure Section 340.5 which state in pertinent part:
In an action for injury or death against a health care provider based upon such person's alleged professional negligence, the time for the commencement of action shall be three years after the date of injury or one year after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury, whichever occurs first. In no event shall the time for commencement of legal action exceed three years unless tolled for any of the following: (1) upon proof of fraud, (2) intentional concealment, or (3) the presence of a foreign body, which has no therapeutic or diagnostic purpose or effect, in the person of the injured person. Actions by a minor shall be commenced within three years from the date of the alleged wrongful act except that actions by a minor under the full age of six years shall be commenced within three years or prior to his eighth birthday whichever provides a longer period. Such time limitation shall be tolled for minors for any period during which parent or guardian and defendant's insurer or health care provider have committed fraud or collusion in the failure to bring an action on behalf of the injured minor for professional negligence.
There is no way to determine at this point whether or not you have a viable case. However, if you pass the Statute of Limitations, you will be forever barred from pursuing this matter.
None of the responses offered here deal specifically with the fact that you are active military and that your injury occurred in the course of med treatment provided to you in that status. I think that is an important fact that bears significantly on your legal rights in this circumstance.
I suggest that you contact one of the attorneys here that is experienced with the additional issues raised by your military status. Attorney Rixon Rafter is excellent: http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/22030-va-rixon-rafter-3562125.html
My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as legal advice. I give legal advice only in the course of an attorney-client relationship. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me. That relationship is established only by individual consultation and execution of a written agreement for legal services.
The key here is that you are on active duty, and this was a physician referred to you, probably as part of tri-care. That dramatically affects whether you can sue, and the time limits for doing so. Contact an attorney experienced in military medical malpractice.
It isn’t possible to assess your situation in this kind of a forum (avvo). Your situation is a bundle of several complex legal concepts (sovereign immunity, active duty service, negligence, mal practice—any one of which presents significant obstacle to your recovery of compensation (not insurmountable, but significant)).
However, some initial concepts can be identified. The most important of which is that a service member cannot sue the government/military for injuries sustained incident to service. It comes from the legal idea of ‘sovereign immunity’—the King is immune from suit—a notion we inherited from England when our nation was formed.
In the 1950’s the US Supreme Court handed down a decision known as the “Feres Doctrine”. In a nutshell it forbids active-duty members who suffer a personal injury from suing the government for damages. Unfortunately, this includes medical malpractice or negligence by military health care providers. Many lawyers and military members are attempting to work legislation through the Hill to correct the injustice of the Feres Doctrine, but it remains the law of the land as of today, and would bar you from suing.
Active-duty members are/can be compensated in other ways for malpractice — retirement disability, Social Security and VA benefits.
In some cases, the federal courts DO allow active duty personnel to recover “derivative damages”. If allowed by the state where the negligence occurred, a service member can recover for lost ‘society and services’ derived from an injury, to a spouse or child who has filed a Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) claim.
BTW, an FTCA claim in a medical malpractice action must be filed within two years of ‘accrual’ of the claim. ‘Accrual’ is defined to occur when a claimant knows he/she has been injured and is aware, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should be aware, of the cause of that injury. It sounds as though one year has expired; you would need to move quickly to preserve your rights before the statute of limitations bars any chance of recovery. The FTCA also requires that you first file a claim with the Navy before you file under the FTCA. The Navy has six months to answer the claim and counteroffer, deny, or approve your request for compensation.
Recommend you immediately contact a military attorney experienced with FTCA claims. That attorney will be able to review all your specific facts and will help you narrow your options, the risks, and the best course of action—that is going to be your best option to obtaining some measure of justice.
READ THIS BEFORE CALLING OR EMAILING ME: I am licensed to practice before the state and federal courts in Virginia. We have not established an attorney-client relationship unless we have a signed representation agreement and you have paid me. I give a 100% effort to get you on the right track with your issue. Sometimes that means legal educational information, sometimes that means counseling and non-legal guidance. You should speak with an attorney to whom you have provided all the facts, before you take steps that may impact your legal rights. I am not obligated to answer subsequent emails or phone calls unless you have hired me. I wish you the best of luck with your situation.
A roundup of the best tips and legal advice.