I had a judge (you know he was appointed...) in my custody case in Family Court.........
A neglect petition arose out of the custody case.
He had a trial for the neglect petition and he was the deciding judge in the neglect trial.
Now I'm hearing he wasn't allowed to do that.
Is that true? If so tell me what the process is called.
I think the term you are looking for is "recusal", that the judge would take himself off a case, but the facts of the case as you've stated them don't seem to support a motion for recusal. Recusal might happen, for instance, if a Judge represented a party in private practice before he became a judge or was related to a party. It's akin to "conflicts of interest".
From what you're saying, the same judge, presumably a Family Court judge, decided a neglect petition against you and is now sitting on a related custody petition. But, as far as I know, there's nothing wrong with that, and he isn't required to seek a new judge to replace him because he's already ruled against you or "biased" (in your eyes or a lay interpretation of bias, but not the legal meaning). He just doesn't like you, perhaps. Since there's no right in Family Court to have cases decided by a "jury of your peers", you are probably stuck with this judge as a factfinder and must rely on your attorney to explain why the facts of the neglect case don't bear on the custody matter.
I'm not sure I follow your point about being appointed and how that would bear on a judge's qualifications. Judges are usually elected in New York but can be appointed to fill out the unexpired term of another judge. Federal judges and the Supreme Court Justices are appointed with legislative approval. One system is not inherently better than the other or indicate any kind of "corruption". Good arguments can be made for both methods of appointment.
If the judte was appointed or elected, it doesn't make a difference. A family court judge has the authority to hear all cases brought in family court. Very often the judges will be assigned certain types of cases administratively but this does not take away their authority to hear other types of cases.
I hope you found this answer helpful and if so, please let me know by clicking the "Mark as Helpful" button at the bottom of this answer. It’s easy and appreciated. You can also choose a "best answer" if you wish. This is easy to do and greatly appreciated.
* This post and all others I make on Internet are for informational purposes only. None of the information or materials I post are legal advice. Nothing I post as comments, answers, or other communications should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. While I try to be accurate, I do not guarantee accuracy.