My brother who is now deceased, was deemed AWOL by the army at his time of death. Sworn statement from roommate inidicated that brother was told to hang out until they see what was going on with his sepereration of course his unit leader denied this but did state that he did visit my brother to see when he was coming back to work. in the report it was stated that a DFR was going to be initiated but a commander indicated not to and continue with the adminsitrative leave that was in process (failed drug urinalysis). Is this typical to stop a drop from roll for being AWOL? Also if AWOl his unit knew where he was, how coould they claim to not know his whereabouts when a sworn statement in his investigation report states a SSG (his supervisor) says they went to see him?
First, I am sorry about your loss. I have actually dealt with a similar situation recently. It is a command decision whether to DFR someone. The norm is 30 days, and I obviously can't speculate why they didn't, but I am also not sure what effect that has on anything now. As for "how they can not claim to know his whereabouts" obviously no one can answer why the unit did this. But the bottom line is that until he was "under military control" he was still AWOL. If you can prove that the unit knew his whereabouts and did nothing about it (or evenly actively encouraged him to stay away) you might have an argument to reverse the AWOL notation. But the problem will be one of timing. In other words even if you can prove they told him to lay low, if he died a year or two later, I seriously doubt the Army will do anything. These situations are very fact specific, and you would need to lay out a specific time line of events for anybody to give you an assessment of the likelihood of overturning the AWOL status.
This post is for information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, nor does it establish an attorney client relationship with Mr. Cassara.