Of course they can be employees of the organization and in fact in most instances they will be. There is no problem with that and the people that operate the non-profit are not expected to do so for free. I mean, the Director of the Red Cross makes millions per year and the President of my NFP undergrad college made over 500K.
You just need to make sure that the salaries that are paid are reasonable for the position.
If you need further clarification, most of us here, including myself, offer a free phone consult.
The law firm of Natoli-Lapin, LLC (Home of Lantern Legal Services) offers our flat-rate legal services in the areas of business law and intellectual property to entrepreneurs, small-to-medium size businesses, independent inventors and artists across the nation and abroad. Feel free to call for a free phone consultation; your inquiries are always welcome: CONTACT: 866-871-8655 Support@LanternLegal.com DISCLAIMER: this is not intended to be specific legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. No attorney-client relationship is formed on the basis of this posting.
Mr. Natoli is absolutely correct. As he stated, their compensation needs to be reasonable for whatever they are providing to the company.
Hope this helps. If you think this post was helpful, please check the answer was a good answer tab below. Thanks. Mr. Geffen is licensed to practice law throughout the state of Texas with an office in Dallas. He is authorized to handle IRS matters throughout the United States and is licensed to practice in US Tax Court as well as The Court of Claims. This answer is provided as a public service and as a general response to a general question, it is not meant, and should not be relied upon as specific legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship.
Yes, it is okay for nonprofit organizations to pay its directors who work for the organization.
Usually nonprofits should not pay board members for "knowledge and skills" solely in their capacity as directors. But if the individuals are using their knowledge and skills in actually providing services to the organization, they may be compensated reasonably. The IRS would want the nonprofit to determine what is reasonable compensation based on what others are paid in similar situations (i.e., doing similar work for similarly situated nonprofits).
There is a potential for a conflict of interest or an "excess benefit transaction" whenever the activities of a tax exempt organization benefit the private interest (compensation) of an officer or director of the organization. The nonprofit organization should adopt a conflict of interest policy and should follow the policy diligently. The IRS publishes a sample conflict of interest policy.
Finally, be sure to consider carefully whether the contracted workers are independent contractors or employees. See IRS guidance on this issue, as well.
Make educated choices with confidence. Contact Marnie Walsh, licensed in Colorado, at 303-279-7229 or www.walshlawpc.com. Online information may be unreliable because your situation involves unique facts and unknown details, the laws applicable to you may be different (especially if you are in a different state), and laws can and do change making online information outdated. Your review of, use of, or reliance upon Marnie’s online posts does not create an attorney-client relationship.
While I agree with the other answers given (compensation needs to be reasonable, services need to be necessary, etc.), one problem inherent with this type of situation is setting appropriate compensation. Certainly the individual should not vote on his or her own compensation; however, where the entire board is "interested" (i.e. receiving compensation), I suggest the board take care to document how it arrived at the compensation amounts (comparable salaries paid by similarly situated charities for example).