What are some examples of a negating defenses and how do you distinguish these from affirmative defenses in an answer to a complaint?
Are you referring to a civil lawsuit in the Superior Court of California? There is no such thing as negating defenses in a civil case in California.
Frank W. Chen has been licensed to practice law in California since 1988. The information presented here is general in nature and is not intended, nor should be construed, as legal advice for a particular case. This Avvo.com posting does not create any attorney-client relationship with the author. For specific advice about your particular situation, please consult with your own attorney.
"Negating defenses"? Never heard of 'em.
Perhaps you want to know what is the difference between a General Denial and Affirmitive Defenses in an Answer.
An Answer is the most common way to respond to a lawsuit. The Answer is the defendant's
opportunity to admit or deny the specific allegations brought against them in the complaint. Any statements in the complaint that are not denied will be taken as true for the purposes of this case. (CCP 431.30(b)(1)).
In the Answer, all defenses to the allegations of the complaint must be raised, and all facts essential to supporting the particular defense must be included. These are called Affirmative Defenses. If you do not raise a particular defense in your answer, you will be prohibited from using or raising it later on.
A General Denial is a simple response to an action. In one sentence, the defendant denies every allegation in the complaint. A defendant's Answer may assert only general denial or both general denial and affirmitive defenses.
This response is for information purpose only and does not constitute a legal advice. This response does not create an attorney-client relationship.