I used to work for a small family owned company. They were shady and underpaid their workers. 3 of my coworkers sued. I wrote statements for 2. I wanted to help support their cases in court, that was the reason why I wrote them. One of them won and another lost the case. This was last year. Yesterday I rc'd a certified mailed letter from the company demanding a letter of apology by 6/15 from me or they will sue for defamation. I was not worried at first but after re-reading my statement, the opening line said something ilke this:
"A series of events have compelled me to write this statement to inform the public of the immoral, unprofessional, and unethical practices...."
I should not have wrote "public." It was not submitted to a 3rd party to be publicized. It was solely used for the in
Employment / Labor Attorney
Actually, those were probably the best words you could have used. The two best defenses to a defamation action are truth (what I said was true) and opinion (can't be proved true or false). You words would seem to fall into the latter.
A couple of points. First, it does not matter that you used the word public. Second, published means communicated to a third party not the subject of the statement. A to C about B is publishing.
If you say "ABC Restaurant has been cited 15 times for having rat feces in the food" and its not true, then you have a probelm.
On the other side of the coin, if you say "ABC Restaurant is the absolute worst place in the universe to eat" there is nothing they can do to you. Its an opinion.
I would want to see the entire letter before rendering a final opinion, but I doubt they have a cause of action against you. They could still sue, but winning is a different matter and I don't think a reputable attorney would do it based on what you wrote.
I concur with Mr. Garner. Also, if the statement was prepared for use in the court cases, the contents would be privileged and its publication would not subject you to liability for defamation. (See Civil Code § 47.)