My atty performed work prepping for my SOC hearing , then quit right beforehand . The paperwork I was billed for which left an open balance , ended up in a box . My follow up atty said most of it was useless in my SOC and he did not need any of it . What are my odds in winning fee arbitration as a result , for the useless docs , subpoenaed docs , and labor of these docs ? Also , what are my odds a getting a refund for the cost of having a new follow up atty spend two days studying the box of paperwork my first atty left behind , just two weeks prior to my hearing date ? The follow up atty charged a whopping $ 5550 for himself to review these two boxes of docs and have me come into his office to meet and catch him up on prepping for my SOC ( custody / child support paternity . . no divorce or assets involved
Oops, I meant "OSC" not "SOC".
Both attorneys seem a little much for a simple hearing but depending on how complex the facts are it may be reasonable. It is impossible to know without knowing the facts and what was billed.
This is not a comprehensive answer and it is impossible to provide a meaningful response without a consultation. Call us for more information. 619.797.5456 www.mataelelaw.com
"My former atty quit leaving a huge unpaid bill for services that ended up not being used as a result. Can I arbitrate fees?" -- Yes, your attorney must submit to non-binding fee arbitration if you timely request it. You may also consider asking your attorney to reduce his fees in return for immediate payment of the agreed sum. Good luck.
I am licensed in California only and my answers on Avvo assume California law. Answers provided by me are for general information only. They are not legal advice. Answers must not be relied upon. Legal advice must be based on the interplay between specific exact facts and the law. This forum does not allow for the discussion of that interplay. My answer to any specific question would likely be different if that interplay were explored during an attorney-client relationship. I provide legal advice during the course of an attorney-client relationship only. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such a relationship. That relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement signed by each of us. The communications on this website are not privileged or confidential and I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo or because I have answered or commented on a question. All legal proceedings involve deadlines and time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take appropriate action and because I do not provide legal advice in answer to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult with an attorney for legal advice. Also, see Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference
Personal Injury Lawyer
Yes, you should go to a fee arbitration through the state bar against the first attorney. Good luck.
I am licensed in California only and my answers on Avvo assume California law. The above answer is for general information only and is based on the information you posted. Every case is fact dependent, so to get a thorough analysis of your situation, you will need to consult face to face with an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where the incident took place. Do not conclusively rely on any information posted online when deciding what to do about your case. No attorney-client relationship shall be created through the use reading of this response on Avvo. You should never delay seeking legal advice, disregard legal advice, or commence or discontinue any legal action because of information in this response.
You didn't mention the basis for arbitrating which usually is a provision in the engagement letter between attorney and client or a right under state law or bar practice to have a neutral panel or arbitrator (often in a grievance procedure) resolve your issues. As an arbitrator, I'd give much weight to what you are presenting (assume all is true and the other side doesn't convincingly refute same). I don't believe an attorney who prepares useless documents and fails to follow through with representing the client, without any basis for behaving that way (as for example, non payment of agreed fees, the discovery that the client has misrepresented a situation, etc.) should be entitled to compensation for that work. Other arbitrators might disagree, but I believe most would agree. Less likely would be your chances of recovering for your second attorney because—just think about it—that would mean you never would pay even once for the work. Unless you can demonstrate that the first attorney caused you to pay more than one would normally pay or that he/she is somehow responsible for an augmented portion of your legal fee, I don't think the odds on that portion of you claim are great—although other arbitrators might disagree. I know $5550 seems high, but I wonder why you didn't get some agreement in advance on what the range of fees would be and also one can't evaluate all the time your second attorney had to put in to prepare and present your case. Hope this helps. Best of luck.
I am an arbitrator and this is not legal advice. I'm licensed in Florida and NY and my response has nothing to do with Ca. law, but is rather just a general approach to your problem. It's impossible to judge the odds of any outcome without a clear understanding of both parties' positions and even then no one can predict results for certain.