My attorney says he copies and pastes a good portion of his work. He says that most lawyers do that. Should I fire him?
I'm not sure why you would find it objectionable, if he is copying and pasting perfectly good legal argument. Why reinvent the wheel? If you have perfectly good text to suit the purpose, why would you spend time, and the client's hard-earned money, reinventing it from scratch, only to charge the client more?
6 lawyers agree
State, Local, and Municipal Law Attorney
I don't see why that's a concern. Attorneys do many routine tasks and use the framework of documents they've previously prepared, then tailoring it to fit a specific circumstance. For example, when drafting a contract I usually start with a standard template I've developed and then add language and specifics as appropriate. I fail to see why you view that as inappropriate. Why not talk to him and explore your concerns and see what he has to say. Otherwise, if you aren't happy with the representation your attorney is providing you always are free to find a new one.
THESE COMMENTS MUST NOT BE CONSIDERED LEGAL ADVICE. Comments made on websites such as Avvo.com are provided for information purposes only, and you should not base a decision to act or refrain from acting based upon this answer. The only way to determine how the law may apply to your particular situation is to consult with an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. Answering this question does not create an attorney-client relationship or otherwise require further consultation. . That relationship is established by the execution of a written agreement for legal services. Also, see Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference.
Social Security Lawyers
"Should I fire him?" Not without knowing a lot more about what he meant, and what services he is providing. It could very well be that a "copy and paste" technique is serving your needs well without any element of dishonesty. Except in a very few situations attorneys recycle language, terms, clauses, and citations and use published or self-developed forms. Drafting and reinventing anew every will, every lease, every discovery request, every contract, every motion, every brief, etc. would not only cost a client a great deal more but would unnecessarily risk errors and omissions. Word processing software facilitates this level of client service, and not having to rekeyboard promotes accuracy. There is still a great deal of expertise needed in knowing exactly what words are the right words to meet the specific client's needs.
Best wishes for an outcome you can accept, and please remember to designate a best answer.
This answer is offered as a public service for general information only and may not be relied upon as legal advice.
8 lawyers agree
Personal Injury Lawyer
While most of the motions in limine I draft for trial deal with issues that have come up over and over again, and the principal argument for, say, precluding evidence of a criminal history, or precluding evidence of "AOB" or alcohol on breath at the scene of the accident, will be the same, though the cases supporting the point may have changed, whether it be for better or worse. There are standard portions of memos of law in support or opposition will always include a section outlining the standard to be applied. Aside from shepardizi
We are serious lawyers for the seriously injured. I am a co-author of WEITZ ON AUTOMOBILE LITIGATION: THE NO FAULT HANDBOOK. The opinions expressed in this answer are not legal advice. These opinions are thoughts based on New York practice. We have no attorney-client relationship. Conducting a conversation with me through the avvo comments section does not create an attorney-client relationship. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance.
Employment / Labor Attorney
In response to your comment to Mr. Taylor: Attorneys rely heavily on citation to authority. In other words, we refer to previous cases, statutes, regulations and more, all as authoritative support for our cases. The courts want us to do this because the American legal system generally relies on precedent. Precedent is law, usually cases, that came before (preceded) the case the attorney is working on, and is used to guide or decide a legal issue. Most often, we include the citation, or legal reference, to the work we are citing. For example, I might make a statement then cite to the case of City of Moorpark v. Superior Court, 18 Cal.4th 1143 (1998). If I make the statement in quote marks, I am citing the exact words from the case. If I use my own words, without quote marks, I am citing to the concepts, facts, or decision in City of Moorpark.
But even without reference to a case or other authority, there are many legal concepts that are so well established that no citation is necessary. And attorneys often use the same text, over and over and over again, to support a legal claim. We use the same text because those words are precedential – they worked before, and we use them because we want the words to work again on behalf of our client.
In short, it is not automatically wrong, and not automatically plagiarism, to use words more than once.
@MikaSpencer * * * twitter.com/MikaSpencer * * * PLEASE READ: All legal actions have time limits, called statutes of limitation. If you miss the deadline for filing your claim, you will lose the opportunity to pursue your case. Please consult with an experienced employment attorney as soon as possible to better preserve your rights. * * * Marilynn Mika Spencer provides information on Avvo as a service to the public, primarily when general information may be of assistance. Avvo is not an appropriate forum for an in-depth response or a detailed analysis. These comments are for information only and should not be considered legal advice. Legal advice must pertain to specific, detailed facts. * * * No attorney-client relationship is created based on this information exchange. * * * Marilynn Mika Spencer is licensed to practice law before all state and federal courts in California and can appear before administrative agencies throughout the country. She is eligible to represent clients in other states on a pro hac vice basis.
Car / Auto Accident Lawyer
Is he cutting and pasting good stuff? If so keep him? There is no reason to reinvent the wheel. If someone else has prepared a good brief, a good complaint, a good motion and you can make it work for you case, there is no reason to start from scratch.
If you feel this is the "best" answer or is "helpful," please indicate. Since I am limited to the information you provide, I cannot guarantee the accuracy of the answer. You should seek the advise of an attorney who can explore all aspects of your question. This communication does not form an attorney client relationship.
2 lawyers agree
If you have a medical malpractice case, you should retain the best medical malpractice attorney who you trust and are able to maintain a good, solid attorney-client relationship with. If the only negative you've ever experienced with this attorney is copying and pasting and everything else--your relationship, your trust, the attorney's accomplishments in the case thus far--is positive and checks out, you should be counting your blessings and jumping for joy. If the copying and pasting issue sticks in your craw because this is the 50th straw that finally broke the proverbial camel's back, then you should first have an open, frank discussion with your attorney and try to hash it out. If you leave that meeting still completely dissatisfied, then you should discuss your situation with other attorneys to better gauge whether your attorney is actually doing poor work or if your expectations might be a little bit off. Good luck!
No attorney-client relationship exists based on the interchange of information provided. Please note: An attorney-client relationship cannot exist with Mr. Zamoyski and his law firm unless there is a fully-executed written retainer agreement by attorney and client. Information provided here is not intended to constitute legal advice, but is informational only.
1 lawyer agrees