his sister, himself and two other brothers. she asked the advice of a lawyer. He told her not
to disburse the funds until he sent a letter to each of them in case one would dispute it. She said that was not going to happen, but took his advice.funds now will be dispursed in a month instead. What was his purpose? My husband and I and the brothers are not
understanding the motive. Should there be concern over this?
As stated by the other attorneys, this is a very common practice and I would not be concerned. The reason why this is done is because, in the event of a dispute, your sister-in-law is entitled to use funds of the estate in order to defend her actions. If she has already paid all of the estate funds out, there is nothing for her to use and she needs to reach into her own pocket, thereby defeating the protection she was supposed to be entitled to. And yes, of course, she can petition the court to have the other beneficiaries return a pro rata share of the funds that, in that event, would have been prematurely distributed. But this is often difficult to collect.
The problem with seeking a waiver or release ahead of time is that it suggests to the interested parties that the executor may be concerned about having done something improperly. (Your concern is a reasonable response to this). There is no easy answer to this situation. Her lawyer has advised her to act cautiously, in order to protect herself, in case a claim is forthcoming. If you have no reason to otherwise suspect something was wrong, I would sign the waiver/release, or simply wait the 30 days for the disbursement.
*** LEGAL DISCLAIMER I am licensed to practice law in the State of Michigan and have offices in Wayne and Ingham Counties. My practice is focused in the areas of estate planning and probate administration. I am ethically required to state that the above answer does not create an attorney/client relationship. These responses should be considered general legal education and are intended to provide general information about the question asked. Frequently, the question does not include important facts that, if known, could significantly change the answer. Information provided on this site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed attorney that practices in your state. The law changes frequently and varies from state to state. If I refer to your state's laws, you should not rely on what I say; I just did a quick Internet search and found something that looked relevant that I hoped you would find helpful. You should verify and confirm any information provided with an attorney licensed in your state.
To be on the safe side, an executor would want to make sure all the beneficiaries agree to large transactions he or she makes on behalf of the estate. It's just being conservative. At this point I probably wouldn't worry much about it.
Criminal Defense Attorney
If disputed, it is far more difficult to get the funds back and hold them until the matter can be resolved than it is to send a letter expressing the intention in the event ab objection is received. It is a standard precaution.
Disclaimer: Nothing in this email message creates an attorney client relationship absent a retainer agreement with this office. Any response to email inquiries should be considered general in nature and should not be relied upon as legal advice. You should always consult a lawyer in your state regarding your specific legal matter. Visit online at http://www.minnesotaLawyers.com
Divorce / Separation Lawyer
As stated already, it's just a conservative precaution. It shouldn't be a big deal.
Disclaimer: This email message in no way creates an attorney client relationship between Majeski Law, LLC and the recipient. Responses are general in nature and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult a lawyer regarding any specific legal matter.