Misclassifying employees as independent contractors?

Asked over 1 year ago - San Francisco, CA

The CA Labor Board (not sure of real name) has been going around to massage establishments and giving out tens of thousands of dollars fines on a recent new law about misclassifying employees as independent contractors. The owners of these establishments are predominantly asian with minimal english skills. Many store, like my mom's, has been opened for more than five years and stared out under the direction of the city hall to classify our employees as independent. Are they allowed to fine people who clearly has no understanding of the situation and never even heard of the law until they were fined? Are they targeting small businesses with non english proficient owners? Shouldn't we only be fined if it was done intentionally?

Attorney answers (2)

  1. Tuvia Korobkin

    Contributor Level 13


    Lawyers agree


    Best Answer
    chosen by asker

    Answered . It sounds like the Labor Commissioner (formally known as the Department of Labor Standards Enforcement) is acting upon the authority granted it in section 226.8 of the California Labor Code, which was signed by Governor Brown in 2011 and took effect last year. Under that new law, employers can be fined thousands of dollars by the Labor Commissioner for the "willful misclassification" of employees as independent contractors. Now, it's not entirely clear what "willful misclassification" means. However, if your mother was truly relying on a directive from a government entity in classifying her workers as independent contractors, then I'd imagine she'd at least have a good argument that her misclassification of her workers was not "willful." Nevertheless, even if she is successful in getting her fine reimbursed, she may be held liable for back taxes, overtime wages, and other penalties as a result of the misclassifications.

    Certainly, your mother should begin treating her employees as employees rather than independent contractors, in order to "stop the bleeding" and avoid future fines.

    Finally, she should consult with an experienced California employment law attorney regarding her situation.

    Good luck!

  2. Neil Pedersen

    Contributor Level 20

    Answered . The short answer is yes. If the employees should have been characterized as employees and not independent contractors, there is no element of knowledge to a successful claim. Whether or not the employer knew the law or not, there is liability. However, proving an unintentional mischaracterization might have an effect on other penalties or damages that might otherwise be assessed against an knowing offender.

    Your mother's best move now would be to hire a competent and experienced employment law attorney to assess her risk and assist her in making changes, if necessary, before the DLSE moves against her.

    Good luck to you and her.

    This answer should not be construed to create any attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship can be formed... more

Related Topics


Employment law governs employee pay, non-discrimination policies, employment classifications, and hiring and firing at the federal, state, and local levels.

Employment as an independent contractor

An independent contractor has a consistent working relationship of performing services for a company or client, but does not meet the criteria for employment.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.


Ask now

29,722 answers this week

3,362 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

29,722 answers this week

3,362 attorneys answering