I have a super annoying neighbor who rides up and down the street on his gas powered scooter all the time, often as early as 6 am and as late as midnight. We have politely asked him to stop, and he gave us the finger. We have tried calling the police but apparently they have better things to do. We have tried contacting their landlords but so far they do not seem willing to step in.
My question is does a landlords obligation to provide quiet enjoyment extend to neighbors of surrounding properties not under their management? I'm just wondering if I have legal leverage into forcing the landlord to take action or else face being taken to court over failure to mitigate the nuisance. I really don't want to move, but I can't go on enduring the noise of that scooter.
I understand your question to mean that you do not share the same landlord--that your neighbor lives in another property and you want to see what his landlord's responsibility is to the neighbors: the answer is none. A landlord is not vicariously liable for the acts of his tenant. This is why some people prefer to live in HOAs, because in associations, the landlord will be fined by the Board for every violation of his renter--but that has no application here if you don't both live in the same HOA.
You can call the non-emergency number of your local police department and see if what he is doing is against any codes. If so, they an cite him, and you can sue him in small claims court for Nuisance and Interference with the Right to Quiet Enjoyment. If it is not illegal, your civil suit will likely not be successful. You can have a local lawyer send him a cease and desist letter, and see if that gets his attention. But he's not obligated to comply. But the landlord has no liability.
If I misunderstood and you share the landlord, then take your lease to a local landlord/tenant attorney and have him advise you on breaking the lease and negotiating with the landlord.
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I have made do not constitute legal advice. Any statements I have made are based upon the very limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made. I am only licensed in California.
2 lawyers agree
General Practice Lawyer
Quiet Enjoyment, believe it or not, has NOTHING to due with peace and quiet. Quiet Enjoyment is a concept by which a landlord becomes obligated to assure the peaceful tenancy of his or her tenants and to defend that tenancy against competing claims of title.
A proper response would require a thorough investigation into the history and background of this relationship. The information provided above is just that, information, to be used as you see fit.