2 / 25 / 13 @ 0908hours , a man called my house . I let the call go to the machine . He stated that he " counseled " my tenant regarding her eviction and it was " imperative " that I return his call . 2 / 26 / 13 @ 1947hours I received another call and let it go to the machine . It was the same man . He stated that I needed to call him back " before further action is taken " . 2 / 26 / 13 @ 2043hours , I got a call on my cell phone from a different number with the same area code ; however , my voice mail is not set up . After some research , I found out that the man is directly related to my tenant and owns a car wash in my tenant’s former city residence and that the other number is connected to someone the caller is related to . Is this illegal for him to lure me into believing he is a lawyer and is this considered harassment ?
I just looked up the caller on The State Bar of California Attorney License Lookup website and there is no such person or lawyer in CA under his name at all.
Personal Injury Lawyer
First of all, the unauthorized/unlicensed practice of law is illegal. While an argument can be made that simply holding oneself out as being an attorney is not the same as actually engaging in the practice of law, it's, nevertheless, wrong to pretend like you're an attorney when you're, in fact, not one.
Secondly, California's civil harassment laws define “harassment” as (a) unlawful violence, like assault or battery or stalking OR (b) a credible (real) threat of violence, AND the violence or threats seriously scare, annoy, or harass someone and there is no valid reason for it. Thus, the information you have provided does not appear to constitute harassment.
Administrative Law Lawyer
On these facts, there is not sufficient basis for concluding that the caller pretended to be an attorney or caused you to believe he is a lawyer. "Counseled" covers a lot of territory including multiple professional and occupational categories and interactions among friends and acquaintances. Nothing about "imperative" is indicative of lawyering. And '"action taken" can refer to almost anything.
No doubt you are right about the caller's intent, but it was artful and vague enough to fall short of actionable civil or criminal conduct.
My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as legal advice. I give legal advice only in the course of an attorney-client relationship. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me. That relationship is established only by individual consultation and execution of a written agreement for legal services.
1 lawyer agrees