Is Intentional Misrepresentation identical to Fraud?

Asked about 2 years ago - Fountain Hills, AZ

Are there any differences between these two claims? In other words, if there is an intentional misrepresentation so as to deceive, induce, etc., wouldn't it be the same thing as fraud?

Attorney answers (1)

  1. Robert J McCarthy Jr

    Contributor Level 12


    Lawyers agree

    Answered . In Massachusetts to sustain a claim of civil misrepresentation, a plaintiff must show a false statement of a material fact made to induce the plaintiff to act, together with reliance on the false statement by the plaintiff to the plaintiff's detriment. See ZIMMERMAN v. KENT, 31 Mass. App. Ct. 72 (1991) [] Civil fraud is defined similarly by case law. Fraud based on deceit, requires the plaintiff to show that the defendant “made a false representation of a material fact with knowledge of its falsity for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to act thereon, and that the plaintiff relied upon the representation as true and acted upon it to [his] damage.” [] You would need to consult with a AZ attorney to get a better understanding of the definitions under AZ law.

    None of the information or materials posted above is intended to constitute legal advice. Viewing this does not... more

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.


Ask now

28,890 answers this week

3,105 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

28,890 answers this week

3,105 attorneys answering