Skip to main content

Is county liable for inverse condemnation beyond retail value of land and wood under eminent domain for a road expansion?

Burke, VA |

The county declared eminent domain to complete a road expansion project. While reimbursement was made to the market value of the land and hardwood. A wall was erected as a sound barrier to reflect noise, vibrations, dust, etc. back onto the road and away the houses along the roadway. The wall is not effective and the noise reverberates over the wall and directly into the third story of a residence. What is the legal recourse for the diminished value and use of the property?

Attorney Answers 3


  1. You might be able to prevail on a "takings" claim, but, as you might expect, suing a municipality or state is difficult. There is possibly a claim, but I'd imagine there would be some issues with proving damages in dollars and cents proof that there is actually some diminution in property values (by sales data, comparables, appraisals, etc.), there may be statutes of limitation, there may be special notice requirements or courts involved (choice of federal courts or courts where municipal claims are heard), that the impacts were not properly predicted or were understated in the pre-construction environmental review, that the sound levels although annoying to some, do not exceed scientifically based impact levels.

    In other words, it's possible, but not a cakewalk. And unlike cases involving improper highway design that might involve personal injury to life or limb, it's doubtful that you will find an attorney or consulting experts who will take this case on a contingency basis, so it would be up to you or your neighbors who are affected to pay the freight and push the rock up the hill.

    This answer is provided under the Avvo.com “Terms and Conditions of Use” (“ToU”), particularly ¶9 which states that any information provided is not intended as legal advice or to create an attorney-client relationship between you and me or any other attorney. Such information is intended for general informational purposes only and should be used only as a starting point for addressing your legal issues. In particular, my answers and those of others are not a substitute for an in-person or telephone consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction about your specific legal issue, and you should not rely solely upon Legal Information you obtain from this website or other resources which may be linked to an answer for informational purposes. You understand that questions and answers or other postings to the Site are not confidential and are not subject to attorney-client privilege. The full Avvo ToU are set forth at http://www.avvo.com/support/terms . In addition, while similar legal principles often apply in many states, I am only licensed to practice in the State of New York and Federal Courts. Any general information I provide about non-New York laws should be checked with an attorney licensed to practice in your State. Lastly, New York State Court rules (22 NYCRR Part 1200, Rule 7.1) also require me to inform you that my answers and attorney profile posted on the Avvo.com site may be considered "attorney advertising" and that "prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome".


  2. This is definitely a tough one, for all the reasons as stated by Mr. Lebowitz. Other difficulties with bringing a case as you describe, could also involve notice or knowledge of the plan to build a sound barrier wall. If you were already compensated through the eminent domain process, the Commonwealth will most certainly try to argue you waived your rights to complain having known/or been noticed of the wall and future expectation of noise levels.

    Proving this type of a case also usually involves hiring consultants who are experts in documenting and measuring noise levels and effects. This will be needed to back up your complaint that the new noise levels and effects far exceed anything you were warned about. There are consulting firms that do noise studies around airports for very similar legal issues. However, this is a cost you would have to pay for, because no one else will. Unfortunately, these types of studies are expensive. Pursuing this, definitely requires an attorney experienced in Eminent Domain/Inverse Condemnation/Property Rights.

    Good luck.

    I am licensed to practice law in the State of Florida only. My answers on Avvo.com are intended only to provide the most basic answers possible to questions posed and are not intended to provide legal advice in any way. Never depend solely on my answers or only on information provided on Avvo.com. Proper legal advice can only be given through in depth consultation with a licensed attorney. When seeking legal advice, always seek advice from an attorney licensed to practice law in your state. Every case is different and my answers here are not intended to serve as legal advice. By answering your question, I hope to provide you, the questioner, with a starting point for examining your legal issue. WARNING: Questions and answers posted on Avvo.com are viewable to the public and NOT protected by attorney client privilege.


  3. Generally speaking, it is very difficult to recover damages for noise. However, if part of the eminent domain settlement included sound attenuation, you may be able to assert a claim for breach of the settlement agreement.
    If there is excessive dust and fumes from the traffic you may also be able to assert a claim for nuisance.

Real estate topics

Top tips from attorneys

What others are asking

Questions?
An attorney can help.

Post a question and get free legal advice from attorneys.

Ask a Lawyer

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer

Browse all legal topics