Skip to main content

In regard to Miranda rights, does "in custody" only mean in jail? Please read on.

Bay City, MI |

If one were suspected of shoplifting and told they had to come with LP at a store, who led them into a small room, told them to sit down and dump out their purse and then an officer showed up, began questioning and then cuffed and arrested them, would this be violating their rights?

Does a custodial interrogation refer only to questions asked once you are in jail, or can it be any place that one does not feel they are allowed to leave? Additionally, can statements given to LP be used in court?

+ Read More

Attorney answers 4


A custodial interrogation has been defined by the US Supreme Court as "questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way." Your personal subjective view does not matter rather the standard is whether a reasonable person innocent of a crime would feel that they were not free to leave. If Miranda is violated only the statements obtained may be excluded i.e. the case likely won't get dismissed if other evidence exists.

Admissions you make to anybody can be used against you. Don't play lawyer, get a good criminal defense attorney.



My experience has shown me that many shoplifters will say things to Loss Prevention that they won't say once they realize the Police is involved. I've always have tried to get as much information as I can prior to that and include it in the Loss Prevention report. I was taught that way and it makes it alot easier for the arresting Police Officer when they have to submit it to the District Attorney Offices. Omer has the best advce and that is "Don't play Lawyer".


The loss prevention officer is not a police officer, and you do not have the same constitutional protections. Any statements made to an LP officer will most likely be admissible against you.

The facts you mention with the police officer sound like you were in "custody" - as soon as a reasonable person would believe they could not leave, Miranda rights are required before proceeding with questions - handcuffs, police station etc are not the determining factor


The LP is not a police officer. Therefore Miranda does not apply to their conduct. Likewise the 4th amendment regarding searches and seizures does not apply to their conduct. In your scenario the arrest did not take place until the cuffs were put on and the person was told they were under arrest. The persons subjective belief that they were not free to leave is not relevant under Michigan law. Miranda and its rights are triggered by the actual arrest. Lastly, yes, statements made to the LP are admissible at trial.


In custody is not limitted to in thr station. Statements to Lp may be admissible. Lp does not have the same Constitutional limits as the police

Criminal defense topics

Recommended articles about Criminal defense

What others are asking

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer