In ER with pneumonia told I was being admitted. Error by registration was cause for change in treatment plan. Can I sue?

Asked over 2 years ago - Sacramento, CA

While on vacation in CA, I became ill and went to an emergency room. I was advised I had pneumonia and was being admitted. They for some unknown reason (I have Medicare) contacted (without consent to discuss my condition) the Veterans Administration and then I was told I was being transferred to a VA Hospital. When I said no, they basically booted me out the door. I cancelled the rest of my vacation and returned home suffering a great deal of pain and stress. Once home, I went to the ER and all the tests were repeated with the same results and was hospitalized for a week with a severe case of pneumonia. They had no right to contact the VA and as a result of doing so I incurred added expenses, medical and personal and endured a great amount of pain and suffering and a worsened condition.

Attorney answers (3)

  1. Christine C McCall

    Pro

    Contributor Level 20

    2

    Lawyers agree

    1

    Answered . Some of the specific details (not set forth in your summary) will bear on the issue of whether this claim, if successfully asserted, would be worth the effort and investment. How long was the interim between the time you left the first ER and the time you were admitted to the facility near your home? In other words, what delay in treatment was caused by this sequence of events? Is there actual evidence that your condition was made worse by that interval, or is your contention based on the logic that pneumonia should be arrested as soon as possible?

    Med mal cases are expensive and difficult to litigate and in most cases the result is not what the lay person would expect based on their experience of the actual event. You should consult with one or more skilled and experienced med mal lawyers, but don't be surprised if the damages and proof issues here are reasons for a recommendation against pursuing a lawsuit.

    My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as legal advice.... more
  2. Steven Mark Sweat

    Pro

    Contributor Level 19

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered . These are expensive cases to litigate. While it sounds very harsh what they did, the damages would probably not justify the expense (believe it or not). If you do want to consider suing, there is a ONE YEAR statute of limitations on medical malpractice claims in California and you would need to have the records reviewed by a medical expert to determine if there as a "breach of the standard of care."

    Nothing in this communication should be construed as creating an attorney client relationship. This is for... more
  3. Marc Edward Stewart

    Contributor Level 16

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered . It is likely that your treatment course and recovery would have been similar even had the California hospital admitted you and treated you on the spot. This means that it would be difficult to show that the hospital caused you to incur damages (over above the pneumonia you already had).

    Also keep in mind that the California statute of limitations is just 1 year. After this limitations period, you can't bring a claim.

Related Topics

Medical malpractice and personal injury

Medical malpractice occurs when a medical professional's negligence causes injury to a patient. Incorrect actions and inaction can both be forms of negligence.

Pain and suffering for personal injury

Pain and suffering refers to physical and mental trauma caused by an injury, and is often a significant component of non-economic damages.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

22,956 answers this week

2,848 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

22,956 answers this week

2,848 attorneys answering