Illinois Bank's violation in collecting on discharged in chapter 7 bankruptcy

Asked over 1 year ago - Quincy, IL

In 2003 i was foreclosured on 3 rental properties and my home that had a home equity loan with a $15,000.00 limit. I had a sum of $5,792 owed after foreclosure on my home equity loan. I filed chapter 7 bankruptcy Jan.2004. In June 2004, at bankruptcy court before court the bank asked me what I wanted and I said to keep my home they said I would have to agree to a loan of $15,000.00 9.5 interest and quit claim the deeds of the rental properties. Then in court I agreed in the front of judge to these terms. And also that day all my other debts including the rental properties were discharged. In October 2004 I signed new mortgage papers for my home for $15,000.00. In Sept 2012 Im looking at my orginal loan papers they have for purpose of as APARTMENT DEFIANCY. So Im assuming they applied extra amount after my real debt of $5792 to my discharged rental properties.. My question isn't that in violation of the bankruptcy rules/laws on discharged debts

Attorney answers (4)

  1. Karen Jackson Porter

    Pro

    Contributor Level 12

    2

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . It sounds like you reaffirmed the second mortgage on your home. That means it was not discharged and you are still liable for the debt. Did you have a lawyer for your chapter 7 case? Did you appear pro se (by yourself) before the court to reaffirm the debt? You agreed to the new terms for the loan. You should talk to a bankruptcy attorney to help you understand what happened and what you are obligated to pay on the reaffirmed debt. If you did not have a lawyer who helped you with the chapter 7 case that you can contact, and cannot afford a lawyer, the court may have a help desk or a panel of lawyers that have agreed to help for free. Best of luck to you.

  2. Marc Gregory Wagman

    Contributor Level 17

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    Answered . Your fact scenario doesn't make sense and a review of the docket is necessary.

    The response given is not intended to create, nor does it create an ongoing duty to respond to questions. The... more
  3. Scott Benjamin Riddle

    Pro

    Contributor Level 20

    2

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . Your question does not make complete sense. First you say the properties were foreclosed in 2003 (in which case you would no longer own them), and then you somehow owned them again in 2004. You say your home had an equity line with a $15,000 limit (and an outstanding balance of $5792), but you later agreed to and signed a new agreement to pay $15,000 (perhaps a reaffirmation) in June 2004? 8 years later you signed a new loan agreement for $15,000. You just mention an equity line, so we don't know of other liens on the home or the value of the home.

    Now, you apparently question why you owe more than $5792? You told us twice you agreed on a loan of $15,000, and presumably you can look at these document to see what you agreed to pay back. If you have agreed to pay back $15,000 in a reaffirmation or refinance, those are the terms of what you now owe. You might comment here, or amend your post to clarify the details.

  4. Carl H Starrett II

    Contributor Level 16

    2

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . It is nearly impossible to answer you questions without more detail and without seeing the documents that you signed. However, it appears that your reaffirmed a $15,000 debt HELOC against your home and the judge approved it. If true, I don't see how this is a discharge violation if you agreed to the $15,000.

    I recommend taking the loan papers to a local bankruptcy attorney for further advice.

    First, the firm is a debt relief agency according to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. We help people file for bankruptcy.... more

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

30,236 answers this week

3,152 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

30,236 answers this week

3,152 attorneys answering