Skip to main content

If perjurious statements were used to acquire a 258e or 209a , does that mean the orders were fraudulently acquired ?

Hardwick, MA |

For the 258e she said we weren't in a relationship in the 209a , she said we were . I have affidavits proving for the 258e and waiting on tape recording for the 209a . But getting a 209a requires that we were in a relationship . In Massachusetts and Federal law , the defendant under oath has knowingly made 2 or more declarations , which are inconsistent to the degree that 1 of them is necessarily false , need not specify which declaration is false if : ( 1 ) each declaration was material to the point in question and ( 2 ) each declaration was made within the period of the statue of limitations for the offense charged under this section . This being said , does the perjury of both claims make them both or one of them fraudulent ?

Attorney Answers 3


  1. Best answer

    I am sorry to hear what you are going through, but I have to admire that you have done your homework. I think that logically one of those statements has to be purgerous, as one has to be true. You need to consult with an attorney where you present to him/her all the facts with all the details. Just a word of caution... You may win points on a technicallity, but you may lose when the substance of the complaint is reviewed. Again, have an attorney go over this with you. Good Luck and God Bless.

    Lawrence Pilon, Esq.
    273 State Street, 2nd Floor
    Springfield, MA 01103

    (413) 304-3477
    www. attorneypilon.com
    attorneypilon@gmail.com

    The answer to this question is for informational purposes only and is expressly not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this without seeking advice from professional advisers.


  2. It depends on the facts of the case and the affidavits filed. Consult with an attorney who can review the documents and better advise you.

    The answer to this question is for informational purposes only and is expressly not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this without seeking advice from professional advisers


  3. Filing an action against a person who propounded lies may be
    protected in part or whole by anti-SLAPP statutes.

    Criminal Law (all misdemeanor & felonies in District and Superior Courts), Drunk Driving and Drug arrests, Sex Offenses, SORB, Crimes involving Violence or Theft, Domestic (Divorce, Child Custody, Alimony and Child Support) and Family Law (Modification, Contempts & Paternity), Juvenile Law, Domestic Violence and Restraining Orders, Business Law, Personal Injury claims, Probate Law (Guardianships, Conservatorships & Estate Administration) and Legal Malpractice. For these and other areas, contact me. NOTE: This preceding message DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship. It is not a protected or confidential communication. The statements made herein are not to be interpreted as representations or warranties of any kind. No reliance should be placed on the statements made herein. It is recommended that the recipient(s) should undertake their own research to reach their own opinion. The writer does not accept professional responsibility on this matter. TO CREATE an attorney-client relationship REQUIRES a signed retainer/fee agreement along with a retainer fee that must be received by my office.

Domestic violence topics

Top tips from attorneys

What others are asking

Questions?
An attorney can help.

Post a question and get free legal advice from attorneys.

Ask a Lawyer

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer

Browse all legal topics