If my old employer disparages me to my new employer, what recourse do I have?

Asked over 1 year ago - Los Angeles, CA

I was laid off from a job recently and told the reason for the layoff was they were eliminating my position. I then obtained a new job. The CEO of the new company is friends with the CEO of my former company. I know they talked recently and I have reason to believe the CEO of my old company said some disparaging things about me and my performance. If I confirm this, do I have grounds to sue the old employer?

Attorney answers (3)

  1. Neville Francis Fernandes

    Contributor Level 11

    4

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . You may have a defamation claim against the old employer but it could be difficult to prove. California employers enjoy a qualified privilege when they provide reference information to other employers. This means that an employer is immune from liability and cannot be sued for defamation, as long as the employer provides the information to a prospective employer who requests it and acts without malice. This protection extends to statements about job performance, qualifications, and eligibility for rehire.

  2. Neil Pedersen

    Contributor Level 20

    4

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . There are very many "disparaging" remarks that could be made about you that would be fully lawful for your former company to make. In fact, the scope of what could be a legitimate claim for defamation is very narrow.

    First, a former employer is allowed to state its opinion about you without exposure. Even if that CEO is the only person in the world who holds that opinion, and you would find 100 people to say that his opinion is off base, that CEO is allowed to state his opinion about you, your work, your work ethic, your integrity, your skills, etc. Opinions cannot be the basis for a defamation claim.

    Second, the California Civil Code gives employers a great amount of latitude to speak to other prospective employers about a former employee. There is a qualified privilege that allows as much. Essentially, to state liability against a former employer for defamation, you need to show the statement of a false present or past fact with something close to malice, meaning an intent to injure, as the motivation for the communication.

    Finally, your facts suggest you are guessing that such a communication occurred. If you were to try to litigate this issue you would find out very quickly that most employers stick together and neither will admit to such a communication occurring.

    Good luck to you.

    This answer should not be construed to create any attorney-client relationship. Such a relationship can be formed... more
  3. Pajman Jassim

    Pro

    Contributor Level 11

    2

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . Depending on the circumstances, you may have a defamation claim, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claim, and a right to recover damages and punitive damages. Feel free to contact us for a free consult.

    This answer does not create an attorney-client relationship between Jassim & Associates or any of its attorneys.... more

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

26,748 answers this week

3,037 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

26,748 answers this week

3,037 attorneys answering