Skip to main content

If I included definitions with my special interrogatories does that make them invalid not requiring an answer from the defendant

Oakland, CA |
Filed under: Lawsuits and disputes

I am the moving party. The case is is an unlimited jurisdiction matter in northern California. I sent over special interrogatories which included definitions and other information I copied over from form rogs from the ca judicial council site. Are my special rogs defective not requiring an answer? How can I cure this defect?

Attorney Answers 1

  1. You cannot copy the definitions from the Judicial Council form interrogatories for use in specially prepared interrogatories.

    If your special interrogatories contained impermissible definitions, these interrogatories are objectionable based upon Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.060, subdivisions (d), (e) and/or (f).

    Therefore, if the responding party objected on the grounds that the interrogatories contained definitions, the defendant does not have to substantively answer the interrogatories. You won't be able to cure this defect. However, you should meet and confer with the opposing side to see if you can resolve the objections BEFORE you attempt to file a motion to compel further responses.

    The information presented here is general in nature and is not intended, nor should be construed, as legal advice. This posting does not create any attorney-client relationship with the author (who is only admitted to practice law in the State of California). For specific advice about your particular situation, consult your own attorney.

Lawsuits and disputes topics

Top tips from attorneys

What others are asking

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer

Browse all legal topics