On the topic of Discovery: If Plaintiff asks Defendant for an extension of time to respond to (defendant's propounded discovery) discovery, and both sides agree that "discovery is due to defendant on or by the 15th", does that mean that it must be in defendant's hands on or by the 15th? Or that it must be 'served' in the mail on or by the 15th.
I don't see anything about 'extension of time' agreements/stipulations being included in the 5 day automatic time extension for mailing (as per Cal CCP 1013).
How much weight does the wording of an extension of time agreement between parties hold?
The stipulation governs. If the stipulation is silent on this issue all the responding party must do to comply with it is serve it on the last day. If served by mail, which is the usual method, you will get it in due course.
I am licensed in California only and my answers on Avvo assume California law. Answers provided by me are for general information only. They are not legal advice. Answers must not be relied upon. Legal advice must be based on the interplay between specific exact facts and the law. This forum does not allow for the discussion of that interplay. My answer to any specific question would likely be different if that interplay were explored during an attorney-client relationship. I provide legal advice during the course of an attorney-client relationship only. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such a relationship. That relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement signed by each of us. The communications on this website are not privileged or confidential and I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo or because I have answered or commented on a question. All legal proceedings involve deadlines and time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take appropriate action and because I do not provide legal advice in answer to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult with an attorney for legal advice. Also, see Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference
1 found this helpful
3 lawyers agree
The exact deadline is governed by the stipulation. If the stipulation states that the response must be in the recipient's hand by certain date that provision governs. If the stipulation is silent on the method of service, I would assume that you may serve by any appropriate means by the due date -- including depositing the response in the mail. Since the Code normally provides 30 days to respond by any allowable means of service including by mail, a 15 day extension should mean you have an extra 15 days to respond by any proper means of service including depositing the response in the mail. If you want to be absolutely certain, get a clarification from the opposing side. Good luck.
This response is for information purpose only and does not constitute a legal advice. This response does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Real Estate Attorney
I would argue that "due to the defendant by the 15th" means that the defendant must have it on the fifteenth. I also think that most attorneys have too much shame to raise a stink about getting the discovery served on the 15th a day late.
Clarifying with opposing counsel is the best idea.