I was "laid off" this week. I was being misclassified and my final paycheck was for less than the 76.93 hours I worked

Asked over 1 year ago - Mission Viejo, CA

I was classified as a 1099 employee, worked a set schedule, in an office, paid hourly. I have yet to file for unemployment as I'm sure the claim would get denied. Also my final paycheck was for a lot less than the hours I worked. Will I need an attorney?

Attorney answers (5)

  1. Matthew P. Blair

    Contributor Level 11

    4

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . More information is needed to determine whether you were in fact misclassified. If it is determined that you were an employee then it sounds like you have a waiting time penalty claim. I suggest that you contact an attorney as soon as possible to evaluate your case.

    Matthew Blair
    www.beverlyhillsbusinesslawyers.com

    Contact me for a FREE case consultation 310-550-1555, email: mblair@chakmakislaw.com. I am licensed in California... more
  2. Patrick John Phillips

    Contributor Level 17

    3

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . Based only on the extremely limited facts you have provided, it is likely that you were misclassified as a contractor. As an employee, you would be entitled to collect unemployment. You would also be entitled to the remedies afforded to employees for the non-payment of wages (infinitely more favorable than the remedies afforded to contractors), including the ability to file a claim with the DLSE and to collect waiting time penalties for the late final payment of wages. In addition, your employer may be subject to a wide range of penalties and fines for the misclassification.

    It would be very wise to retain a local employment law attorney to pursue this matter on your behalf, as these claims can get complicated.

    Best of luck moving forward.

    Patrick Phillips
    http://www.johnphillipslaw.com
    (858) 925-7184

    This answer is a general interpretation of the law and is not fact specific to your case. Likewise it does not... more
  3. Edna Carroll Straus

    Contributor Level 19

    2

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . if this was as you say the IRS and the WCAB will be less then thrilled. (I have been there.) I would file with the EDD and show them the proof. (you will need some solid evidence.)

    They can be more flexible than you might think and you have nothing to lose.

    Ms. Straus (aka Carroll) may be reached at 800-400-8978 during regular business hours, Pacific Time, or anytime by... more
  4. Khoa Maxwell Nuyen

    Contributor Level 5

    2

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . Classifying an employee as an 1099 independent contractor is a common way for a company to avoid paying taxes, benefits, and overtime. However, there are strict rules on the application of this classification. I would most definite consult with an attorney about your situation.

  5. Charles Hyunchul Jung

    Contributor Level 1

    2

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . One test California applies is called the "economic realities" which was adopted by the California Supreme Court in S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341.

    Here are the factors:
    . In applying the economic realities test, the most significant factor to be considered is whether the person to whom service is rendered (the employer or principal) has control or the right to control the worker both as to the work done and the manner and means in which it is performed. Additional factors that may be considered depending on the issue involved are:

    1. Whether the person performing services is engaged in an occupation or business distinct from that of the principal;
    2. Whether or not the work is a part of the regular business of the principal or alleged employer;
    3. Whether the principal or the worker supplies the instrumentalities, tools, and the place for the person doing the work;
    4. The alleged employee’s investment in the equipment or materials required by his or her task or his or her employment of helpers;
    5. Whether the service rendered requires a special skill;
    6. The kind of occupation, with reference to whether, in the locality, the work is usually done under the direction of the principal or by a specialist without supervision;
    7. The alleged employee’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on his or her managerial skill;
    8. The length of time for which the services are to be performed;
    9. The degree of permanence of the working relationship;
    10. The method of payment, whether by time or by the job; and
    11. Whether or not the parties believe they are creating an employer-employee relationship may have some bearing on the question, but is not determinative since this is a question of law based on objective tests.

    You can find out more at the links below.

    Please note that this is not legal advice and is for information only. We can only serve as your attorney if both... more

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

23,984 answers this week

2,798 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

23,984 answers this week

2,798 attorneys answering