While chewing up the mc bite I felt somthing moving in my mouth I pulled it out and it was.a warm.... Eww no joking I have proff also I tock it back to mc.donalds and all they did was refun my money...what should I do??
That is pretty gross but I'm not sure it is the thing lawsuits are made of. Since there was no physical injury, it's even possible that the law in Florida would not allow recovery of emotional distress. You may want to consider making a complaint to the manager or to McDonalds quality control about the incident.
In Florida when it comes to foreign objects in food, the standard it what one would "reasonably expect" to be in the food substance. Although one would not expect to find a worm in a fish bite, as plaintiff, the party bringing the lawsuit, you must still prove your damages. Therefore, you should consult with a personal injury attorney as soon as possible.
Yes. You have several causes of action against not only the local franchise, but also against the McDonald's corporation as well.
I would recommend a personal injury attorney with premises liability experience. Foreign objects in food cases are very similar to premises liability both in legal substance and strategy (because they are both against businesses which are open to the pubic).
Feel free to message me if you'd like more information.
I agree with all of the advice from the good AVVO attorneys indicating that the likelihood of success in such a claim is not high. My contribution, in answering your concern, is the article linked below on emotional distress law, including foreign objects in food: [Blue Link Below]
Don't Eat there anymore. I assume that your warm was a worm – how unappetizing. Without any significant damages, this probably is not worth pursuing. You certainly could call the State Health Department or write the McDonald's headquarters if you want some further action taken.
If this information has been helpful, please indicate below.
Mr. Lundeen is licensed to practice law in Florida and Vermont. The response herein is not legal advice and does not create an attorney/client relationship. The response is in the form of legal education and is intended to provide general information about the matter within the question. Oftentimes the question does not include significant and important facts and timelines that, if known, could significantly change the reply and make it unsuitable. Mr. Lundeen strongly advises the questioner to confer with an attorney in your state in order to ensure proper advice is received.
Get free answers from experienced attorneys.
28,736 answers this week
2,939 attorneys answering
Don't speak legalese? We define thousands of terms in plain English.Browse our legal dictionary