I have a discrimination case with my former employer through the EEOC. My case now is headed to mediation. I was discharged for allegations brought against me from an employee which I demoted because of his attitude and previous write up's including suspensions. The employee stated that I borrowed $60.00 from him and gave him a lap top for collateral. He stated this exchanged happened months ago. I explained to HR i did sell the employee the lap top months ago but i did not borrow any money and informed HR that this was a form of retaliation towards me. If i borrowed money from the employee why is he now saying these things and didn't come forward earlier being that he has been written up and suspended before. However I explained how could they terminate me without any proof and no real investigation. They told me the had already came up with their decision. I have a voice recorder with the HR saying they "didn't feel an investigation was necessary", as well as, witnesses willing to verify how i was treated. I feel that HR wanted to terminate me because i went over their heads and spoke with corporate officials about an issue that was going on for 8 months and was not solved. I was terminated for false allegations but there remains other management employees of different race still employed after doing things against company policy. I plan on taking my former employer to court for a lawsuit. How much could i sue for?
I am a California attorney and not eligible to give legal advice in your state. My comments are for information only, based on federal law and general legal principles. YOUR STATE MAY HAVE ITS OWN LAWS THAT PROVIDE SIMILAR OR GREATER PROTECTION. If I refer to your state's laws, that only means I did a quick Internet search and found something that appeared relevant. You should not rely on any comment I make regarding your state's law. You MUST check with an attorney licensed in your state.
The answer to your question will turn on specific facts. The Avvo board is not really set up to handle the kind of detailed analysis that is needed in your situation. Avvo works best for short, specific questions that allow for short, specific answers. Perhaps more importantly, anyone can read the discussions on Avvo so they are not confidential. Your employer or whomever you are in a dispute with can read everything written here.
The advice to retain your own attorney is good advice. You cannot hope to handle anything of this magnitude on your own, including an EEOC mediation. The EEOC is not your representative. A mediator for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) www.eeoc.gov has one client – the United States of America. Some EEOC mediators are great and will do their best to protect you rights even though they are not your advocate. Some EEOC mediators stink and care more about closing the case than they
Because the EEOC has a particular mission and because it is not representing you, if it turns out your interests and those of the EEOC clash, the EEOC mediator will first and foremost make sure the agency’s goals are carried out, not yours.
Also, the EEOC will only consider issues relevant to laws the EEOC enforces, such as discrimination laws. It will not consider such things as employer liability under state law (which in some states, like California, is substantially more than under federal law), wage and hour violations, mutuality in the settlement agreement, circumstances under which you might have to return the money, the language of the settlement agreement (which could have all kinds of "gotchas" that the EEOC doesn't notice or doesn't deal with), and more.
In addition, EEOC mediators most often handle low-value cases because that is what ends up in their offices. They handle high-value cases far less frequently, and even less frequently handle high-value cases where the charging party doesn’t have an attorney. If you show up without an attorney, the mediator may interpret your case as low-value, even if it isn’t. Of course the mediator may learn the value of your case during the mediation, but why start off with such a large obstacle?
Similarly, without an attorney, the employer probably won't take you or your case seriously, and may be able to take advantage of you. No one is watching your back if you don't have your own attorney.
Consider that the employer most likely has an attorney or has consulted with its attorney. Even if the employer doesn't have an attorney, it usually has human resources personnel who have been down this route before and know far better than you do how to use the system to its own advantage.
It is nearly always the case that a charging party will do better overall with an attorney, even taking into consideration the attorney's fees portion of the recovery.
Also, with respect to your possible whistleblower case, please see my Avvo guide: http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/whistleblo...
I cannot tell you how much you can sue for, however, if you want to recover anything, hire a lawyer. Your opponents in this matter are pros at working within this system. You are not.
With your story and your tape recorder in you hand, you will be steamrolled and left slack-jawed with nothing.
After thoroughly reviewing all of the facts and circumstances of your situation, your attorney can provide you with some insight into the potential value of your claims, if any.
Get free answers from experienced attorneys.
24,412 answers this week
3,213 attorneys answering
Get answers from top-rated lawyers.
24,412 answers this week
3,213 attorneys answering