I moved out of my rental on Feb. 28th. While I was taking a load of my stuff to storage before I handed in my keys on that day, I caught my landlord going through the house. At the time he said the house looked great. Now fast forward to today (April 16) when I get a letter from an attorneys office asking me to pay a debt to my ex-landlord. This debt totaled $1574.18 minus my security deposit of $650 equaling $924.18. These charges include new carpeting (that per my lease states I had to have cleaned, which I paid for, as its a charge on this list), new doors (one I had replaced the week after I moved), damaged siding, etc. Do I need to hire an attorney and fight this or is there nothing I can do?
Contracts / Agreements Lawyer
Was the carpet and/or doors set to be replaced anyway? And, do they have any proof of the damages they allege? If there is no supporting evidence, and the carpeting and doors were set to be replaced either way, it may be worthwhile to hire an attorney to fight. If you did cause this damage, it was more than "ordinary wear and tear", and, deductions from the deposit were within 21 days of moving out, it would be difficult to prevail - even with effective assistance of counsel.
1 lawyer agrees
Personal Injury Lawyer
Consult with a local landlord tenant lawyer to determine whether it makes sense to retain counsel. You should not be charged for normal wear and tear. How old was the carpeting when you vacated the premises? What shape was it in when you left? Consult with a lawyer and take all of your doucments and other information along to to your meeting with the laweyr.
2 lawyers agree
If the landlord or his attorney didn't send a letter to you until April 16, he has failed to return the security deposit within 21 days as required by law. In addition to the response from the other attorneys, you will have a claim for double damages plus reasonable attorney's fees. You should hire an attorney.
Legal disclaimer: No attorney-client relationship is formed by this communication. Any recommendation/information given through Avvo should be considered only as opinion.