My ex-partner is trying to force a partition sale of a home we share as J T W R S. My questions are: 1. Are residents forced to leave the house when it goes on sale or only after it is sold? 2. Do the lien holders get paid first, then attorney and then the remainder divided between co-owners? 3. If the house is upside down in value, would a court force the sale if there is no equity?
Partition actions in CA are governed by Code of Civil Procedure section 871.010 et seq. Disputes between spouses involving division of community or quasi community real property are excluded from partition by CCP 872.210 (b) as are disputes between registered domestic partnerships.
Partition actions are expensive. Anyone with an interest in the property, including lienholders, must be joined. If the owners cannot agree on the terms of partition, the court must order a sale of the property.
The filing of the partition action may accelerate any loan and an early foreclosure of the property. While unlikely, as long as the loans are being kept current, it is more likely when the property is underwater.
The court in a partition action is a court of equity and may make orders as appropriate. Generally, however, a party in possession cannot be forced to deliver up possession until the property is sold. However, the court can make orders regarding payment of expenses relating to the property while the action is pending.
“Do the lien holders get paid first, then attorney and then the remainder divided between co-owners?” – Yes, that would be the typical case. However, the entire cost of the partition action, not just the attorney fees, would be paid by the parties in the percentage of their interest in the property.
“If the house is upside down in value, would a court force the sale if there is no equity?” – Yes, that is a possibility. Therefore, because of the cost and expense of a partition action it is far better for the parties to mediate their dispute if they cannot agree, or arbitrate it. In nearly all cases, each party will fair substantially better financially if the costs of partition can be avoided.
I am licensed in California only and my answers on Avvo assume California law. Answers provided by me are for general information only. They are not legal advice. Answers must not be relied upon. Legal advice must be based on the interplay between specific exact facts and the law. This forum does not allow for the discussion of that interplay. My answer to any specific question would likely be different if that interplay were explored during an attorney-client relationship. I provide legal advice during the course of an attorney-client relationship only. The exchange of information through this forum does not establish such a relationship. That relationship is established only by personal and direct consultation with me followed by the execution of a written attorney-client agreement signed by each of us. The communications on this website are not privileged or confidential and I assume no duty to anyone by my participation on Avvo or because I have answered or commented on a question. All legal proceedings involve deadlines and time limiting statutes. So that legal rights are not lost for failure to timely take appropriate action and because I do not provide legal advice in answer to any question, if you are an interested party you should promptly and personally consult with an attorney for legal advice. Also, see Avvo's terms and conditions of use, specifically item 9, incorporated by this reference
1 found this helpful
1 lawyer agrees
1. No, not until after the house is sold.
2. Yes, all lien holders and encumbrances must be paid in the priority set by statute. Upon granting judgment partitioning by sale of each property, the court will order that the proceeds of the sale pay the encumbrances thereon, and the net proceeds thereof then be divided between the parties in an equitable amount to be determined by the court, in addition to allowance, accounting, contribution, or other compensatory adjustment among the parties according to principles of equity, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 872.140. In such a partition action, each party will need to present evidence of why the court ought to distribute the proceeds differently than the ownership percentages.
3. Yes, even if there is no equity in the house. Note that a partition action does not necessarily mean the property needs to be sold to a third party. You could end up buying out the other owner and become the sole owner, or alternatively, the court could reallocate the ownership percentages of each owner.
Frank W. Chen has been licensed to practice law in California since 1988. The information presented here is general in nature and is not intended, nor should be construed, as legal advice for a particular case. This Avvo.com posting does not create any attorney-client relationship with the author. For specific advice about your particular situation, please consult with your own attorney.
2 found this helpful
2 lawyers agree
Construction / Development Lawyer
Don't fight this type of action. Most judges will grant your husband's partition action. Instead, work out the sale of the house. If it is under water, work out with the lender through a short sale. Of course, the above advise is based upon that your ex is not under any court order to pay for your house payment or expenses as a part of his child support or spousal support. If there are on-going issues with regard the payments to the house related to child support or spousal support, you have to resolve your dispute in the family court where your divorce was finalized. Edward C. Ip www.lawyer4property.com
No attorney / client relationship established. The answr is for discussion and general information only. The lawyer had not reviewed any documents or contract prior to the above comments.