Skip to main content

How does a former employer have a right to deny section 32

Tonawanda, NY |

got a call from my attorney stating employer does not want to settle and he didn't say why. employer terminated me two years ago for being out to long on w/c. i have a back injury that occured in 2009. What i don't understand is how could the employer still have any say so over weather to settle or not, i didn't cause my self to get fired. I always thought settlements was up to insurance co. not employer.Attorney asked for 170,000 originally under a section 32, he said he won't go lower than 130,000 because he dosen't want to seem desprate and may be they will take this offer, he said 130,000 is fair. my aww before i got hurt was 1250.00 a week, was offer to high. my diagnosis is sprains, strains, and contusions.

+ Read More

Attorney answers 3


If I had to bet, your employer either has a high deductible workers' compensation policy or is self insured. In both cases, the claim might be administered by an "insurance company", but the $ to pay your settlement will come out of the employer's own workers compensation reserve fund, and they don't want to part with the money just yet. Your attorney should know if this is the situation, so ask him. By the way, if your diagnosis is truly only "sprains, strains and contusions", if they offer you $130,000, take it and run. Good luck!

Any answers to Avvo questions are for general public legal information and do not establish an attorney/client relationship with Troy Rosasco or his law firm. Individuals should always consult their own attorney on the specifics of their individual legal issues.



Mr. rosasco you were right, my former employer is self insured threw a third party adminstrator.


I am sorry to hear about your situation. Have you spoken about this with your attorney who you hired and presumably trusted with the care of your case? You should discuss it with your attorney and if you are not satisfied you might want to seek out other legal counsel.

I wish you the best of luck.

Please remember that I do not normally monitor these questions after I have posted a reply but you can contact me as indicated below.

Complimentary phone consultations
Hayley Greenberg
Greenberg & Merola, LLP
Attorneys at Law
521 5th Ave. Ste. 1700
New York, NY 10175
(212) 593-6111, facsimile (516) 887-1720
(Additional offices: Brooklyn, Queens, Long Island)


Dear Madam or Sir in Tonowanda:

Neither side can be required to settle a workers' compensation claim, just as neither side can be compelled to settle a lawsuit in Supreme Court over a traffic accident. You need two sides that are willing to settle. Otherwise, a case simply goes its normal course.

There are many injured claimants who are offered Settlements that refuse them; in the long run, a Settlement is usually for the benefit of the Insurance Company.

It may be that the Insurance Company is being influenced by its insured Employer not to settle, (they do pay the premiums) or it may be the decision of the Insurance Company alone.

It is pure speculation to guess why they don't want to settle. Perhaps they thought your Demand was too high; perhaps they are hoping you will not live long enough to cost them a lot of money in biweekly payments.

Remember, this is what they are saying now; things can always change.

Good Luck with your claim and good luck to the Bills this weekend.

Leonard Feld

Employment topics

Recommended articles about Employment

What others are asking

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer