Here is a tricky and intense question regarding the Anti-SLAPP laws, construction law, as well as entertainment law

Asked 4 months ago - La Verne, CA

Cable Network A hired independent production company B to produce a reality series which would involve performing construction services on numerous consumers homes. Production company B directly contracts with the consumers for the construction work, without a license, therefore they are acting in the capacity of a contractor without a license. Something goes horribly wrong at Consumer C's home, and it is found out that permits were not pulled on this home as well as all 13 other homes that Production company B worked on prior to. Consumer C files an injunction against Cable Network A and production company B to get them to stop filming and broadcasting this series, but Cable Network A files an Anti-SLAPP motion. Isn't consumer C protected under CAL. BPC 7028.4 in obtaining an injunction?

Attorney answers (4)

  1. Nicholas Basil Spirtos

    Contributor Level 20

    4

    Lawyers agree

    1

    Answered . The fact that network or production company were involved in unlicensed contracting is probably not enough to get the filming or broadcasting stopped. They may be right in filing an anti-slapp motion in response to your injunction request.
    You may have claims against them for faulty construction or not pulling a permit, and possibly other issues. If you paid them anything, then not having a license could entitle you to disgorgement.
    What claims you may have will probably depend on the contracts that were entered into. Take everything to an experienced construction attorney for review.
    And you will probably need to hire an attorney to deal with the anit-slapp issues.

  2. Cathleen M Curl

    Contributor Level 12

    3

    Lawyers agree

    1

    Answered . An unlicensed contractor is not allowed to recover money for their work which requires a license so you can demand a refund from the unlicensed contractor if you paid him any money, or sue him to get it back if necessary. You may also want to file a complaint with the CSLB. It's a good idea to discuss this with an experienced construction attorney, particularly the anti-slapp issues.

  3. Nina C Montoya

    Pro

    Contributor Level 7

    2

    Lawyers agree

    Answered . As the other attorneys here have noted, you likely have a case for disgorgment of money paid for construction and/or for damage done to the home. This all depends on the details and your contract. I'm certain that Network A has a clause in their contracts limiting any damages resulting from their breach of a contract to money damages and absolutely excluding injunctive/equitable relief. You'll need an attorney to help you respond to the Anti-SLAPP. If they are successful, they will be awarded attorneys fees for costs in bringing the SLAPP motion to strike.

  4. George William Wolff

    Contributor Level 13

    1

    Lawyer agrees

    1

    Answered . I think suing to stop production or broadcast would trigger the antislapp law.

    Plus there probably is a contract provision with the homeowner allowing the broadcast of the the work done.

    However, assuming it would not violate the contract in some way you probably could sue to defective construction , doing work without permits or a license etc

    This is NOT legal advice, just a general discussion of the law, as we are not familiar with the specific... more

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.

 

Ask now

30,512 answers this week

3,195 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

30,512 answers this week

3,195 attorneys answering