Received 2 DUIs in 1 month. 1st DUI, I blew .13 and ran off the road (accident, nobody injured). 2nd DUI didnt blow. Reason was I only had 2 beers in a 2 hr time period and was stopped for no particular reason other than the cop stating I didnt stop so I was not about to risk anything blowing into the machine. Now I'm in the biggest pickle of my life. The 1st DUI has not gone to court yet and the 2nd DUI is 1.5 months from now. The DUIs are in different counties. If convicted of the 1st DUI will the court for the 2nd DUI see it and automatically enhance penalties?
I feel my lawyer and I have good enough defense to reduce or even dismiss the 2nd DUI since there is no chemical evidence other than the refusal (admitting of guilt).
The DUIs happened about 3 weeks apart.
Criminal Defense Attorney
If these are the only DUIs that you have, the second DUI should only be filed as a DUI first, because it did not occur after you had been previously convicted of a DUI. However, the prosecutor may take the 1st DUI in consideration regarding what they will recommend as a dispositino. Like I said, it cannot be enhanced by law, because you have to have a previousl conviction, and the 1st DUI had not been closed. Keep consulting with your local attorney.
This response represents general informational material only and is not intended to offer legal advice. You should not rely on or use information presented here without consulting a lawyer regarding your specific circumstances, changes to applicable laws, rules and regulations, and other legal issues. Representation: Use of this website does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidentiality: Communication through e-mail is not confidential. We may have prior client relationships or other potential conflicts that would prevent us from representing you or from treating your communications as confidential. For any information you consider confidential, please first contact us by telephone or make a personal visit. " The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements."
1 lawyer agrees