| 1. |
|
| 2. |
|
| 3. |
|
Estate plan structure
Mill Valley, CA
Viewed 54 times.
Posted 24 days ago in Estate Planning
Flag as objectionable
How would you structure an estate plan for a married couple in California containing only the following assets?
1. Roll over IRA. 2. Home with title held as community property with right of survivorship. 3. No personal property. 4. Insufficient assets for A-B Trust Answers (2)John Rolfe Windsor Jr.
This attorney is licensed in Louisiana and 2 other states.
Posted 24 days ago.
Flag as objectionable
Consult a local attorney who is either a CPA as well, or has a Masters in Taxation. Your total asset value, assets includable in your taxable estate at either the Federal or State [or both] levels will play a very important role in how to structure you estate. Those considerations will affect the "personal" structure of your plan, and how you get assets to the intended beneficiary(s). Although you say you have "insufficient assets for an A-B trust", that is in fact 2 trusts, and unless you know what the estate/inheritance tax structure in your state of residence is, and if you have counted all your assets [life insurance death benefits may need to be counted], you can not know, unless you know enough to plan your own estate. Additionally, many of my clients now consider "A-B" type trust arrangements to protect their spouse following their death for reasons beyond estate taxes - creditor, fraud, disinheritance protection are a few.
The assets you list include an IRA which has it own set of rules relating to income taxation during your life, and following your death, that do not necessarily work well with the estate tax structure at the Federal level. Should consideration be given to "stretch" planning for the IRA, etc. Additonally, the community property assets need to be planned by someone who understands how they are treated for tax purposes, if you have a taxable estate [either state or Federal or both]. What about probate in your state, the costs, pitfalls, etc? In summary, you need to provide more information, but often without the assistance of an attorney who is well versed in this area of planning, will you even know what you have of consequence, or how to plan for it. Randy Marvin Spiro
This attorney is licensed in California.
Posted 24 days ago.
Flag as objectionable
The home would be deeded by quitclaim to a revocable trust to be prepared by an attorney. The plan should include two pour-over wills to cover assets not transferred into the trust during the couple's life. If the spouse is to get everything under the estate plan, the spouse should be the primary beneficiary of the IRA. Whether the children or the trust is the contingent beneficiary depends in part on whether the children are minors (trust) or adults (children themselves) The plan should include a durable power of attorney for health care decision making. Further, on the IRA, a power of attorney should be executed to give another person access to the IRA in the event of the IRA-holder's incapacity. If the spouse is to get everything, one alternative to the A/B trust is a disclaimer trust which allows the spouse to revoke or amend the entire trust on the first-to-die's death, but which gives the spouse the ability to disclaim (refuse) assets to protect the first-to-die's exemption (the free amount that a person can die with and pay no estate taxes) under which arrangement the disclaimed assets would pass to an irrevocable trust for the survivor's use. The disclaimer must be made within 9 months of the first-to-die's death, which allows the survivor the ability to look at the size of the estate, the size of the exemption and the survivor's life expectancy in determining whether or not to protect the first-to-die's exemption.
|