It really should not impact the case. The police responded to a call, 911 or otherwise. Their direct observations are what will matter, along w/any tests performed on the road or at the stationhouse.
I am a criminal defense attorney practicing in Nassau, Suffolk and New York City. The above information is not a substitution for a meeting whereas all potential legal issues can be discussed.
Simply receiving the first phone call gave the police a legally justified reason to go to your house. Once they were at your house, and saw that you had arrived, they had reason to investigate further, because of the conflicting phone calls they had received. I'm assuming that the further investigation revealed that you were allegedly DWI. So the fact that the prosecution MIGHT not be able to use the deposition in court could possibly impact the strength of the prosecution's case, if you decided to take this matter to trial. However, if the police officer's investigation once you arrived at your house, i.e. field sobriety tests you performed, what you blew in the preliminary breath test at your house, what you blew in the formal breathylizer at the police station, how much you told the officer you had been drinking, etc., provided the officer with significant evidence to charge you with DWI, then THAT significant evidence, and the sufficiency with which it was gathered will be the major factors in your case. The prosecution's ability to use the deposition might or might not just be icing on the cake. You should speak with an attorney in your area who is knowledgeable about such matters, because, no doubt you are facing at least one DWI misdemeanor, which is a serious charge, as traffic charges go. Good luck to you!
Matthew J. Werblin, Esq.
Attorney at Law
81 Molly Court
Niskayuna, NY 12309-2227
Probably not. But if NY follows the Aguilar-Spinelli rule, the cops have to corroborate the informant's tip prior to contacting you or the contact and subsequent detention is unlawful. Usually, corroboration entails seeing you drive erratically. In your case, it would be observing indications that you were intoxicated as you exited your vehicle. The Aguilar-Spinelli rule has been overruled in several states, however, so you should ask your attorney whether it applies in your case based on your state constitution.
This answer is my personal opinion, offered for informational purposes only. It is not a legal opinion, nor is it legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship with anyone reading it.
The police would not need the deposition to prove your guilt. If they were waiting for you at your home and saw you pull in, then they have evidence of your "operation" of a motor vehicle. The officers can also testify as to their opinion of your level of intoxication based on their observations (red watery eyes, slurred speech, alcohol on breath, unsteady on feet, etc.) as well as offer any scientific evidence of your blood alcohol content.
The caller simply gives the police probable cause to investigate you for DWI regardless of the deposition.
I am a former Deputy Bureau Chief with the Kings County DA’s Office and adjunct professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, with over 15 years experience specializing in criminal law cases. I offer free in-person, phone and video consultations.
All answers are for information purposes only. Answering this question or any future questions does not form any attorney-client relationship. Be mindful, that answers are limited by the limited facts presented by the questioner and are not meant to take the place of competent legal advice by an attorney fully informed of all the facts surrounding your case. However, be aware that nothing posted in a public forum such as this can be deemed confidential or privileged communication. For a privileged private consultation, contact me at 212-385-8600 or via my website www.reasonabledoubtny.com
A roundup of the best tips and legal advice.