1. That is unlikely. The Court can likely correct the error in the MSA (really, the Judgment, which would be the operative instrument, because the clear intention was for the wife to be the beneficiary - that was the "current" life insurance policy that existed. 2. Is the "damaged" party the wife who drew the MSA containing the agreement? Is she damaged (and if so, what is her damage?), or is this merely a hypothetical?
Please note that this answer does not constitute legal advice, and should not be relied on, as each situation is fact specific, and it is not possible to evaluate a legal problem without a comprehensive consultation and review of all the facts and court pleadings filed in the case. This answer does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Assuming there is only the one policy, then most likely no. The court should wind up requiring H to pay premiums with W as beneficiary (probably supporting the idea that W is still receiving spousal support and/or child support).
Orange County Family Law Attorney: (949) 218-0574 - This response provides general information, and is not intended to be legal advice. Getting information from Avvo, or any site, is not a substitute for advice from a qualified attorney who considers all of the facts and circumstances. Nothing here creates an attorney-client relationship. You should consult with an attorney in person and reach an agreement on representation. This response is not intended to be an advertisement or solicitation of services in any jurisdiction where it does not fully comply with all applicable laws or rules.
A weekly guide with tips and legal advice for each stage of the process.