Generally, most parenting plans outline in specifics what you are to do in terms of notifying the other parent about the whereabouts of the minor child. I would have informed the mother and would have advised my client to do so. Furthermore, you have a limited two week uninterrupted visitation with the child and instead of spending that time with the child you are leaving he or she with the grandparents and going out of state.
That is just my opinion, and others may vary. I hope you get to spend some more of that time with the child.
You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation since every case is different and not all information is relayed in an online question. The Law Office of Ophelia Bernal-Mora, P.A. is a family & criminal law firm located in Orlando, Florida, we invite you to contact us and welcome your calls at 407-354-5223. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.
If the final judgment does not prohibit the father from leaving the child with grandparents and/or if there is not a clause addressing each parents' right of first refusal to care for the child, there does not appear to be anything that is contemptible occurring. It is however, not an action that is in the spirit of shared parental responsibility, which requires both parents to discuss and come to agreement on issues of concern revolving around the child.
If I had represented the father, I would have advised him to either spend the two weeks with the child, or to advise the mother of his intentions to allow the child time with his/her grandparents. If I represented the mother and she came to me with this scenario, while I would sympathize with her being left out of the loop, I would advise that unless the final judgment prohibits this, or unless the grandparents are a danger to the child, to let it go and move on.
Sandra K. Ambrose