If medical providers will bill on a lien basis, does medicaid / medicare need to be notified or billed?
Rather than going through a lengthy subrogation process, can I just get all services on a lien basis and have my attorney pay the medical providers out of the proceeds?
For accident related injuries, I want to see a MD that does not acept medicaid but will perform services on a lien basis. Is this ok?
Insurance Law Lawyer
I'm sorry to hear about your injury. The answer to this kind of question will vary from state to state. I recommend you seek the counsel of an attorney licensed in California to help you with this process. As you stated, if you utilize medicaid to pay for accident related medical treatment and you recover a settlement that includes damages for past medical expenses (which most do), then you must reimburse medicaid. While the whole process is a little annoying, it makes sense and is pretty fair. That said, you have the right to chose your own medical providers and treatment. Having medicaid doesn't mean you must use it. Often the best medical providers do not accept medicaid. In the context of treating a traumatic injury, your choice of medical providers is very important. Let's face it, no one wants a bargain basement Neurosurgeon operating on or around their spinal cord. Generally, you can choose to proceed with treatment with the medical provider of your choice on a lien basis. Just make sure (1) The medical provider is willing to perform the services on a lien basis; (2) Your attorney approves of the medical provider and the terms of the lien; and (3) The medical provider is charging a fair amount for its services. Good luck.
Please note: The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. Visiting this site does not create an attorney client relationship between our firm or any of its lawyers and you. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation.
Personal Injury Lawyer
Generally you do not have to use medicare but usually it will work to your advantage to do so. The following is an example. if you do a straight lien with a medical provider you will likely have to pay back 100% of the charges. If you use medicare they may pay $20 on a $100 bill. You will get the benefit of the $100 bill in your case but will only have a $20 reimbursement obligation. Medicare is getting much better at being efficient in the subrogation process. Finally if you use medicare or not the insurance company will likely demand to have a letter from medicare stating nothing is owed so in that sense you will still need to deal with medicare. My thoughts are go ahead and use medicare.
Animal Attack and Dog Bite Attorney
Medicaid/Medicare have an automatic right to subrogation. You are right, the other option would be to not bill it through medicare/medicaid and sign a lien. Your attorney could negotiate with the provider for reduction and payment of the lien at the time of settlement. This will be much faster than that subrogation process through Medicare/Medicaid.
Nothing in this communication should be construed as creating an attorney client relationship. This is for informational purposes only. Attorney will take no action on your behalf unless and until a written retainer agreement is signed. There are strict time deadlines on filing claims and, as such, you are advised to consult with and retain an attorney immediately to file such claims timely or you will lose any right to recovery.
3 lawyers agree