Skip to main content

Do you have to send a notice of deposition when sending out a subpoena for deposition (records only)?

White Hall, IL |
Filed under: Discovery

Other party sent out subpoena for deposition (records only) but I never received a "notice of Deposition" the records were apprantly mailed to the other party and then other party mailed to records to me? Shouldn't I have received notice?

Other party says they didn't send notice because it was records that the other party was entitled to anyways. ie minors medical and education records.

Attorney Answers 4


  1. If you are a party, you are entitled to notice.


  2. Notice of the issuance of the subpoena must be served upon the other parties, even if the subpoena is just for records.


  3. I watched this issue debated in court yesterday. None of the lawyers or the judge could cite such a rule.
    Of course, the judge dealt with it another way, but it made me wonder, without the time to research it, is there such a Rule? www.galivanlaw.net

Lawsuits and disputes topics

Top tips from attorneys

What others are asking

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

- or -

Search for lawyers by reviews and ratings.

Find a Lawyer

Browse all legal topics