"...In the absence of a contrary expression of intent, it is logical that engagement rings should be considered, by their very nature, conditional gifts given in contemplation of marriage. Once it is established the ring is an engagement ring, it is a conditional gift. "
Kansas Heiman v. Parrish, 262 Kan. 926, 942 P.2d 631, 634 (1997).
Other courts have reached a similar conclusion on the conditional gift concept.
Florida See Gill v. Shively, 320 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. App. 1975);
California See Simonian v. Donoian, 96 Cal. App. 2d 259, 215 P.2d 119 (1950);
Connecticutt See White v. Finch, 3 Conn. Cir. Ct. 138, 209 A.2d 199 (1964);
Illinois See Vann v. Vehrs, 260 Ill. App. 3d 648, 633 N.E.2d 102 (1994);
Check with a lawyer in your locale to discuss more of the details. The law changes constantly.
Good luck to you.
NOTE: This answer is made available by the lawyer for educational purposes only. By using or participating in this site you understand that there is no attorney client privilege between you and the attorney responding. This site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney that practices in the subject practice discipline and with whom you have an attorney client relationship along with all the privileges that relationship provides. The law changes frequently and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Contact and hire a lawyer to update the legal research. The information and materials provided are general in nature, and may not apply to a specific factual or legal circumstance described in the question.