Our art team was having issues with our AD, and we felt that he was unable to address those issues so we (a team mate and I) went over him to his boss the CD and the VP. I wanted them to know what problems we were having (mainly resource allocation and asset scheduling). We are the only two female members on the art team. A week or so later our AD pulls us (just the two women) into separate performance reviews and proceeds to tell us about how much we are under performing. He did this on a Friday a week before I was to get married and he knew about it for months. He never told us what we could do to improve or that anything was wrong before this review, and we had reviews prior to this one. I reported it to HR and they sat on the case for 4 months. This story continues...
Administrative Law Lawyer
Nothing related here raises issues of a sound claim against your manager or employer. Perhaps there is more to the story.
Most retaliation by supervisors and managers is not unlawful. Acts of retaliation are unlawful only when based on the employee's exercise of anti-discrimination rights and other protected activity, such as complaints about unlawful discriminatory practices. Here, because your original complaint was not within the legal definition of protected activity, the manager's retaliation (assuming that it can be proven to be that) is unlikely to be found to be unlawful.
There is also nothing improper or unlawful about the manager's review of your performance, even if his assessment is wrong. Nor do you have a legal ground for complaining about the timing of the manager's performance review.
Unless there is more to this story that you did not include here, it is unlikely that you have a sound employment law claim and you need to start thinking about ways to salvage this situation.
No legal advice here. READ THIS BEFORE you contact me! My responses to questions on Avvo are never intended as legal advice and must not be relied upon as if they were legal advice. I give legal advice ONLY in the course of a formal attorney-client relationship. Exchange of information through Avvo's Questions forum does not establish an attorney-client relationship with me. That relationship is established only by joint execution of a written agreement for legal services. My law firm does not provide free consultations. Please do not call or write to me with a “few questions” that require me to analyze the specific facts of your history and your license application and prescribe for you how to get a State license. Send me an email to schedule a paid Consultation for that kind of information, direction, and assistance. My law firm presently accepts cases involving State and federal licenses and permits; discipline against State and federal licenses; and disciplinary and academic challenges to universities, colleges, boarding schools, and private schools. We take cases of wrongful termination or employment discrimination only if the claims involve peace officers, universities or colleges.
2 lawyers agree
Real Estate Attorney
You point out that you are the only two female members of the team, and you were the ones he said were underperforming. Discrimination on the account of sex is unlawful, but your statement of the facts suggested that he more likely retaliated against you because you complained about him---perhaps unfair, but still legal---than he did discriminate against you because of your sex. You would need a lot of evidence of sex-related discrimination to show that that was the reason for his conduct.