Discrimination at Employment: Acts Vs Common law

Asked about 2 years ago - San Francisco, CA

I learnt that some form of discrimination are protected by Act. There are few others that are illegal and protected by common law.

Could someone shed some light into this?

The matter is employees stealing from a public company (btw, does it matter if it is a private company of the same size, ie many employees) - whistle blower get fired. Would this be only protected by common law? Is there anything to reference such a common law?

Should the terminology Discrimination be used in this case or rather retaliation and wrongful termination?

Attorney answers (3)

  1. Michael Robert Kirschbaum

    Contributor Level 19


    Lawyers agree

    Answered . There are some acts that are prohibited by a specific statute. For example, under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, it is illegal for an employer to discriminate against employees due to protected classifications, such as race, age, gender, handicap, and a number of other categories itemized in the law itself.

    In common law, there may not necessarily be a specific statute the prohibits an activity but it has been recognized by case law to be unlawful as a matter of public policy. For example, it has been recognized that it is in the public interest that employees be paid wages timely and correctly as a matter of law. We do not have a statute that says it is unlawful to fire an employee who asks that an employer pay correct wages for overtime worked, but the courts have held that common law prevents an employer from doing so. Firing an employee for asking to be paid correctly is a violation of public policy.

    I hope this helps you understand better.

    They say you get what you pay for, and this response is free, so take it for what it is worth. This is my opinion... more
  2. Marilynn Mika Spencer

    Contributor Level 20


    Lawyers agree

    Answered . Please look at my Avvo guide on California's at-will employment law, which should help you understand your rights: http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/a-short-su....

    Employment discrimination is against the public policy of California and the United States. Many people misunderstand the meaning of employment discrimination. “Discrimination” does not mean an employer has to be fair, respectful or has to make good decisions. Workplace discrimination means the employer treats one person or group differently from others who are not in the same group, but are similarly situated.

    The only workplace discrimination that is illegal is discrimination that is against public policy. Public policy refers only to things that are specifically prohibited by a statute (law) enacted by the legislature, or prohibited by a regulation promulgated (established) by a government agency. Public policy includes statutes prohibiting discrimination against people in specific protected groups, which include sex, race, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, age (40 years and older), religion, marital status, pregnancy and genetic information. Sexual harassment is considered a form of sex discrimination.

    Public policy also protects people who blow the whistle on a matter of public concern, complain about improper wage and hour practices, or who exercise voting rights, family leave rights, jury duty rights, domestic violence rights, and a few more rights protected by statute.

    An employer cannot change terms of employment or fire an employee if the reason for the change is against the law (against public policy). For example, an employer cannot increase your workload because of your race, sex, national origin, religion, etc. or because you blew the whistle on safety violations.

    There are various ways to enforce these rights, depending on the particular public policy involved. For more information on discrimination law, please see my Avvo guide on this subject: http://www.avvo.com/legal-guides/ugc/what-is-un....

    *** All legal actions have time limits, called statutes of limitation. If you miss the deadline for filing your... more
  3. George Ellis Corson IV


    Contributor Level 20

    Answered . Your whistle-blower example would probably be statutory, depending on the facts of the theft and reporting.

    Attorneys are very competitive. Choose the Best Answer so we know who helped you the most.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask a Lawyer

Get free answers from experienced attorneys.


Ask now

24,324 answers this week

2,763 attorneys answering

Ask a Lawyer

Get answers from top-rated lawyers.

  • It's FREE
  • It's easy
  • It's anonymous

24,324 answers this week

2,763 attorneys answering

Legal Dictionary

Don't speak legalese? We define thousands of terms in plain English.

Browse our legal dictionary